Close Please enter your Username and Password
Reset Password
If you've forgotten your password, you can enter your email address below. An email will then be sent with a link to set up a new password.
Cancel
Reset Link Sent
Password reset link sent to
Check your email and enter the confirmation code:
Don't see the email?
  • Resend Confirmation Link
  • Start Over
Close
If you have any questions, please contact Customer Service


Sweethoney2007 64F
5104 posts
9/19/2008 10:49 pm
Economy squeezes the American Dream

Work hard, play by the rules and tomorrow will be better than today. That implicit promise has been at the core of the American Experience through good times and bad.
But now, whipsawed by plummeting home values, $4-a-gallon gas, rising food prices and gyrating financial markets, Americans increasingly fear that the national bargain has unraveled, that their once-steady march toward affluence has derailed. In a new USA TODAY poll, 54% of those surveyed say their standard of living is no better today than five years ago.

"Fewer Americans now than at any time in the last half century believe they're moving forward in life," concluded a recent report by the Washington, D.C.-based Pew Research Center.

The USA TODAY respondents were more upbeat about the prospects for improvement in the next five years, but only 45% expect their to live better than they do.

"I don't think it is going to be as easy for them. They're going to have to pay back a tremendous debt load. … I just don't see the opportunities being there," says Matt Gwynne, 63, a retired executive in Angier, N.C.

FIND MORE STORIES IN: Washington | North Carolina | World War II | General Motors | Buffalo | Iran | Dow Jones | TVs | SUVs | Reno | Dream | Hummer | Honda Civic | Experience | Economic Policy Institute | Ford Expedition | McMansions | Jared Bernstein | Economists | Angier | Stefan Jacoby
So is the American Dream dead? Well, it's at least wounded.

Today's economic malaise caps a prolonged period during which the typical American lost ground.

From the end of the 2001 recession through last year, median household income fell almost every year even as the economy expanded and individual workers became more productive. The most recent official data indicate that in 2006, half of all families made more than $58,407 and half made less. That compares with an inflation-adjusted peak of $59,398 in 2000.

This financial stall marked the first time since World War II that the typical family was worse off at the end of an economic expansion than at the start, according to the Economic Policy Institute (EP, a left-of-center think tank in Washington, D.C.

"This is the first business cycle on record where the median family income failed to recover its previous peak," EPI economist Jared Bernstein says. "It's been a uniquely disappointing cycle from the perspective of the median-income family."

And that was before a financial crisis emerged last year from a remote corner of the U.S. housing market to stalk every worker, firm and family. Friday's nearly 400-point plunge in the Dow, triggered by a sharp rise in oil prices, only underscored a gathering unease about the future.

Suddenly, a nation that confidently had binged on McMansions, huge SUVs and flat-screen TVs faces a future of smaller dwellings, shrunken cars and painful credit card debt repayment.

A shift toward small

Economists cite numerous culprits for the financial fizzle: weaker unions unable to resist pressures on wages, more intense global competition and a mismatch between a growing demand for skilled workers and slowing growth in the typical worker's years of schooling.

Anecdotal evidence of compressed living standards isn't difficult to find. In 2007, the median American home was almost 50% larger than the typical family dwelling a generation earlier in 1975. Tomorrow's homes are likely to be smaller, not larger, as the easy credit that made suburban palaces affordable is no more.

Likewise, the ever-larger vehicles Americans drove in recent years owed their swaggering existence to a now-bygone era of cheap oil – $12 a barrel in 1998. With a barrel of oil now costing nearly $140 and gas prices at $4 a gallon, consumers have abruptly ended their decade-long love affair with behemoths such as the nearly three-ton Ford Expedition (twice the weight of May's best-selling Honda Civic).

Underscoring the new reality, General Motors last week announced it's closing four truck plants, boosting production of fuel-sipping sedans and considering selling its iconic Hummer brand. Executives industrywide are scrambling to retool for what they say is a permanent shift in the American lifestyle.

"There's a tremendous change in this market going on. A tremendous shift from light trucks, pickups, heavy SUVs toward more compact passenger cars. … The times of having cheap energy are over. Mobility will get more expensive for all of us," says Stefan Jacoby, 50, CEO of Volkswagen of North America.

In Reno, information technology professional Bob Ryczko, 36, is so concerned about the future that he's decided not to marry or have . Despite a base salary of about $130,000, Ryczko expects to be worse off a year from now because of fast-rising food and energy costs.

It's not as if there were no economic problems in the late 1970s and early 1980s, when Ryczko was growing up in Buffalo. Oil prices surged after the Iranian oil embargo in 1979 and the subsequent 1981-82 recession was the most severe since the 1930s.

Yet, simply by working hard at what Ryczko calls "blue-collar jobs" – his dad was a printer, his mom worked for the local phone company – his parents put two through college and on the path to a better life.

Now, with swollen health care premiums, college tuition rising twice as fast as the rate of inflation and food and energy growing more expensive by the day, duplicating his parents' accomplishment seems impossible.

"Even in my 20s, everything seemed to be very obtainable," Ryczko says.

"Now with the economy, oil prices and everything, it's just very difficult for Americans to stay in the middle class. We're getting squeezed out."

Widespread angst over this "middle-class squeeze" has animated the presidential campaign.

In November, likely Democratic nominee Sen. Barack Obama identified an urgent need "to reclaim" the American Dream, saying, "Today, the cost of that dream is rising faster than ever before. While some have prospered beyond imagination in this global economy, middle-class Americans – as well as those working hard to become middle class – are seeing the American Dream slip further and further away."

Last week, Arizona Sen. John McCain, Obama's presumptive Republican rival this fall, acknowledged widespread economic anxieties but struck an upbeat note.

"We've always believed our best days are ahead of us," he said. "I believe that still."

A pinch on the middle class

Writer James Truslow Adams was the first to coin the term "American Dream," writing in 1931 that it was "that dream of a land in which life should be better and richer and fuller for everyone, with opportunity for each according to ability or achievement."

Amid the darkest days of the Depression, with the unemployment rate then heading toward 20%, Adams' ideal seemed more illusion than aspiration.

However, once the nation had escaped the clutches of economic collapse and world war, his vision was realized.

In a period that economists now refer to as the golden age, rich and poor alike prospered. From the end of World War II in 1945 to 1973, those at the bottom of the income charts actually advanced a bit faster than those at the top, in what Harvard University economists Claudia Goldin and Lawrence Katz labeled "growing together."

In recent years, however, most of the economic gains have gone to those at the top.

The richest one-tenth of American families – those with incomes above $104,700 in 2006 – accounted for almost half (49.7 of all income that year, according to economist Emmanuel Saez of the University of California, Berkeley.

That represented the highest share since 1917, higher even than at the stock market peak before the crash of 1929, says Saez, who studied income tax and Census data since 1913.

His analysis shows that the richest of the rich – the top 1% of American families making at least $382,600 – have garnered especially large gains. From 1993 to 2006, those families captured about half of the nation's overall growth. From 2002 to 2006, they received about three-quarters of total growth.

Saez's research helps explain the seeming contradiction between the well-documented middle-class frustration with working harder just to stay in place and the American economy's continued growth.

The U.S. economy last year was almost 18% larger than in 2000, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis. But the typical American family, whose income dipped slightly over that period, saw no evidence of it.

There's no doubt that over the long term, the typical American's living standards have improved dramatically. Compared with the 1970s, Americans have higher incomes, bigger homes, fancier cars and better health care.

An explosion of digital technologies, even just since 1990, has introduced a wealth of communication and entertainment products whose benefits aren't readily apparent from sterile income statistics. More than 30 million Americans traveled to another country in 2006, twice as many as in 1990.

In 2007, Brink Lindsey's The Age of Abundance celebrated the emergence of this era of mass prosperity. The Cato Institute analyst notes that items that were considered luxuries in middle-class homes in the early 1970s – dishwashers, clothes dryers and air conditioners – now are routinely found in households that are below the poverty line, which for a family of four is less than $21,200 annual income.

"On the 'stuff' front, people are doing better than ever," he says.

But Americans have long taken for granted the idea of continual improvement. That – and the postwar notion of shared prosperity – is what's now at risk.

"The problem I see is more stagnation than out-and-out decline," Bernstein says. "But stagnation is a huge problem."

A more serious problem

For some, the problem is more serious than stagnation; it's the very real prospect of sliding back.

Growing up in Sunnyvale, Calif., Dale Keller had no illusions about the difficulties of maintaining a middle-class lifestyle.

His father worked for Wonder Bread for 35 years, but five years before retirement was downsized out of his job as human resources director and sent to manage a bakery.

"There will be no middle class the way we're going in this country," he warned his .

So after graduating from Golden Gate University in San Francisco, Keller anticipated a career path that would twist and turn.

He navigated more than two decades' worth of corporate upheavals before accepting in July 2006 a $150,000-a-year marketing position with a Pennsylvania manufacturer of automated train control systems.

Four months later, the company opted to leave the business to concentrate on more promising areas. After 24 years in the industry, Keller was out of work.

His bad fortune came just as the economy began to feel the first aftershocks from the housing collapse. After almost two years, he still can't find anything that pays much more than half of his former salary. And employers won't hire him for those jobs, fearing he'd eventually grow dissatisfied and leave.

"I'm one of those who've fallen through the cracks. I don't know what to do," he laments.

"It's like your train's derailed, and you can't get it back on the tracks."

So now Keller, 46, lives in Canonsburg, south of Pittsburgh, and wonders how long his savings will hold out.

He's tried to support his wife, whose health problems keep her from working, and 9-year-old by trading currencies and stocks from home.

It's not working, Keller says.

"I'm in a squeeze," he says. "And I'm just praying to God I can make it through."

This story is the first in an occasional series examining how Americans and the U.S. economy are not advancing, particularly in relation to foreign competitors.

By David J. Lynch, USA TODAY




Isaiah 42:8 " I am the Lord; that is my name! And My glory I will not give to another, nor My praise to graven images."


Tropical_Man 68M
6389 posts
9/20/2008 4:50 am

economic growth was 3.3% last quarter which is exceptional


Sweethoney2007 64F
6565 posts
9/20/2008 9:55 am

Pete, America will fall as a world leader, Europe will be the new world power.....anti Christ will rise out of Europe. America will join the New world government. Christians who say that Jesus is the only way may be imprisoned as it will be illegal to proselytize.

Isaiah 42:8 " I am the Lord; that is my name! And My glory I will not give to another, nor My praise to graven images."


Sweethoney2007 64F
6565 posts
9/20/2008 9:56 am

Dennis

Your head is in the sand like many Americans.


Isaiah 42:8 " I am the Lord; that is my name! And My glory I will not give to another, nor My praise to graven images."