Close Please enter your Username and Password
Reset Password
If you've forgotten your password, you can enter your email address below. An email will then be sent with a link to set up a new password.
Cancel
Reset Link Sent
Password reset link sent to
Check your email and enter the confirmation code:
Don't see the email?
  • Resend Confirmation Link
  • Start Over
Close
If you have any questions, please contact Customer Service


Exodus24 58M
167 posts
12/21/2011 8:46 pm
Illicit vs solicit -Comprehension 101


Ruthless bloggers do not comprehend the difference between these terms...A basic dictionary will help -don't worry it won't hurt your 'ego' to use a dictionary...

Solicit: request a response. Ex: Soliciting the murder of a victim.

Illicit: get a response, forbidden by law. Ex: I accuse nobody without proof, because I realize it's just as bad to accuse someone frivolously as to do something illicit.

Note: Attempting to discredit me with slander will NOT solicit or illicit mens rea from me...Stop wasting your time,,,more importantly stop wasting everyone's time.

[RueHue: Lawyers without a reasonable doubt do visit Big Church...I was introduced to one in chat last month.

I wrote the LSAT ONCE in 1987 with a score of 176 being in the 98th percentile... A student at Columbia University I received athletic and academic scholarships and veritably completed my university career - I didn't drop out of *cough* the college in San Diego or the Navy.......But like you said 'who cares about the certificates' right???-after you flaunted nonetheless.....Leave your attempt at writing the LSAT or anything pertaining to a test around intellect and expertise at that,,,don't waste the money and examiners' time......Ruethless I am 100% straight in sexual orientation....Knock off your obsession with me and infantile attempts to cross examine me and everyone else with a brain.....It is disturbing.....Go back to your new 'ditzy' and 'easily duped' *cough* friends,,,using blogs as a diary to whine and blabber about pointless activities.....See ya.]


Exodus24 58M
750 posts
12/22/2011 6:45 pm

    Quoting  :

Aren't you a fine example of illegitimate identity illusions ROCKY


RueHue 58M

12/22/2011 10:13 pm

Apparently, you missed the point because of an apparent "reasonable doubt" for being in BC. Your use of "illicit" was as a verb, but in the context could only have been understood as an adjective (which it is). In fact, the example you gave below is also as adjective (could also be a noun, but that would make less sense in your use, or an adverb).(i.e., "illegel").

You submit: "Illicit: get a response, forbidden by law. Ex: I accuse nobody without proof, because I realize it's just as bad to accuse someone frivolously as to do something illicit."

Yes, we've seen all the "proof" of your accusatory: more accusatory.

So, with your use of this term and its other sense (as with any, and all, of the other terms and words you've so far used in the onslaught of your accusative tone), you are (in the linguistic sense of 'illicit') "improperly formed, ungrammatical."

Anything else? At least, freeway thinks you're funny. Are you ill? It sounds like you have a cough.


RueHue 58M

12/22/2011 10:23 pm

    Quoting  :

They are quite significant, Rooky. Especially when portrayed as "real" identities in photos and professions, as in Doozy's case. But you know people don't believe you are Iggy Pop or Exodus (well, we're reasonably certain you are not Iggy Pop).


RueHue 58M

12/22/2011 11:06 pm

You, obviously, missed the point because of an apparent "reasonable doubt" for being in BC. Your use of "illicit" was as a verb, but in the context could only have been understood as an adjective (which it is). In fact, the example you gave below is also as adjective (could also be a noun, but that would make less sense in your use of it, or as an adverb).(i.e., "illegel").

You submit: "Illicit: get a response, forbidden by law. Ex: I accuse nobody without proof, because I realize it's just as bad to accuse someone frivolously as to do something illicit." (<----or could be understood as noun here, but in NO WAY as verb.)

Yes, we've seen all the "proof" of your accusatory: more accusatory.

So, with your use of this term and its other sense (as with any, and all, of the other terms and words you've so far used with the onslaught of your accusative tone), you are (in the linguistic sense of 'illicit') "improperly formed, ungrammatical."

LOL. it sounds like you wasted a lot of money on an education (or you did a good 'copy and paste' job from someone's online resume); "veritably completed my university career"? Who writes like that?

I'll help with some of your education: an ellipsis is typically represented w/ a series of marks (..., ***) to indicate an omission; the usual convention is nor more than a series of three marks. The next time you post, since you omit so much (like AL proof in your accusatory, you may as well simply write ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. It would make the same amount of sense as your previous work.

Such as, "I didn't drop out of *cough* the college in San Diego or the Navy" You went to college and were in the navy in San Diego, too? Well, which did I drop out of? I dropped out of the navy, too? You are epitomizing 'doozy' more than I ever could by dubbing you as such

Anything else? At least, freeway thinks you're funny. Are you ill? You should get that cough checked out. It could be caused by smoking, though.


Exodus24 58M
750 posts
12/23/2011 4:36 am

    Quoting RueHue:
    You, obviously, missed the point because of an apparent "reasonable doubt" for being in BC. Your use of "illicit" was as a verb, but in the context could only have been understood as an adjective (which it is). In fact, the example you gave below is also as adjective (could also be a noun, but that would make less sense in your use of it, or as an adverb).(i.e., "illegel").

    You submit: "Illicit: get a response, forbidden by law. Ex: I accuse nobody without proof, because I realize it's just as bad to accuse someone frivolously as to do something illicit." (<----or could be understood as noun here, but in NO WAY as verb.)

    Yes, we've seen all the "proof" of your accusatory: more accusatory.

    So, with your use of this term and its other sense (as with any, and all, of the other terms and words you've so far used with the onslaught of your accusative tone), you are (in the linguistic sense of 'illicit') "improperly formed, ungrammatical."

    LOL. it sounds like you wasted a lot of money on an education (or you did a good 'copy and paste' job from someone's online resume); "veritably completed my university career"? Who writes like that?

    I'll help with some of your education: an ellipsis is typically represented w/ a series of marks (..., ***) to indicate an omission; the usual convention is nor more than a series of three marks. The next time you post, since you omit so much (like AL proof in your accusatory, you may as well simply write ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. It would make the same amount of sense as your previous work.

    Such as, "I didn't drop out of *cough* the college in San Diego or the Navy" You went to college and were in the navy in San Diego, too? Well, which did I drop out of? I dropped out of the navy, too? You are epitomizing 'doozy' more than I ever could by dubbing you as such

    Anything else? At least, freeway thinks you're funny. Are you ill? You should get that cough checked out. It could be caused by smoking, though.
My rate is $275/hour...Scanning thru your foolishness a.k.a. attempted 'Instructional Manual' that is faulty leaves you owing me more money than you would earn in a year...It is Christmas,,,you have sent your personalities my way...Hey,,,I'll give you a referral discount and see if your alimony to your wives can be waved for month... I'll cover those 1-800 phone calls and psychiatric bills for ya too......I don't want your help,,,I don't want to see your smug face around here -referring to your actual photos...Wish you were a guitarist huh??? Guess what??? I am,,,therefore I can help YOU.- It pains you that Freewayryder is a friend of mine...Ask Santa for friends this Christmas...Put down the bottle...Make right and you could have an un-sucky holiday...


Exodus24 58M
750 posts
12/24/2011 10:27 am

    Quoting  :

Charla,,,I was not the source of the name calling...You have been told who is but choose to allow him to manipulate,,,the one that continues to spew all over my blog...Did you see the quotation marks used??? They were not my words but his.....You see how he treats women??? Pay attention.....There have been a multitude of fine individuals who have put your interest ahead of themselves...Make right with them too,,,no one belittled you....Merry Christmas.


Exodus24 58M
750 posts
12/29/2011 6:35 am

    Quoting  :

Probably when I return home...


Exodus24 58M
750 posts
12/31/2011 11:36 am

    Quoting Exodus24:
    I am me and me alone...You say you're smart tho you listen to gossip...I don't have time for this Charla...If you are going to follow suit with the other adolescents here don't bother writing on my blog...You have as much 'proof' as they do,,,NONE! A shame you listen to Glory,,,every week she has a new suspicion of me...You are all engaging in slander,,,yeah look that up too...You support the abusers...The honesty and care I have offered has been sincere...Wake up to reality woman...And rethink your blogs...Writing about stalking??? Deleting RueHue's threats??? BAD moves...See ya.
I am me and me alone...You say you're smart??? You perpetuate gossip and jump on the latest band wagon...You let any jerk try to manipulate you and perpetuate their abuse...I don't have time for this Charla...If you are going to follow suit with the other adolescents here don't bother writing on my blog...You have as much 'proof' as they do,,,NONE! A shame you listen to Glory,,,every week she has a new suspicion of me...You are all engaging in slander,,,yeah look that up too...You support the abusers...The honesty and concern I have offered has been sincere...Wake up to reality woman...And rethink your blogs...Writing about stalking??? Deleting RueHue's threats??? BAD moves...See ya.


Exodus24 58M
750 posts
1/3/2012 9:30 pm

    Quoting  :

I get it...It's evident you don't appreciate advise from good folk per your responses tho you listen to the devil's ally RueHue...Leave this be...Move on......Shalom