Advertisement
Bringing people together in love and faith
My Blog
Blogs > Tropical_Man > Mercy
Mercy
  
Hope

Exploring Psychology and Meds

Apologetics

The Rest of the Gospel

Names of International scammers
Title View |
Confession Dec 9, 2008 8:14 am
95 Views
1 jn 1

A STUDY OF THE TEXT
The immediate context upon which an understanding of the popular doctrine on
the confession of sin rests is 1 John 1:1-10; 2:1,2. A careful study of these verses
will give us the message that the Holy Spirit wants to convey. As we will see it is a
far different message from the one that is being taught.
An eyewitness testimony about Jesus Christ – 1 John 1:1, 2
John, in these verses, proves beyond any doubt that Jesus Christ was a real person, not a
phantom as some false teachers (probably Gnostics) were teaching. John’s first-hand
account of Christ’s life before and after the resurrection is crucial to the message of this
epistle. If Jesus was less than genuine, then the testimony of 1 John (indeed all of the
New Testament) is a fraud. But John, the last living eyewitness among the apostles,
confirms the genuineness of Jesus Christ, His person, and His work.
The immediate purposes of the epistle – 1 John 1:3, 4
In order to appreciate the two purposes for the writing of 1 John chapter 1, it is important
to first understand the overall purpose of the epistle. That purpose is found in 1 John 5:13
which says, “I write these things to you who believe in the name of the Son of God so that
you may know that you have eternal life.” Because of false teachers the apostle John
wrote the epistle for the saints to understand what constitutes genuine salvation, who has
it, and who does not.
These “seducers” (1 John 2:26, KJV) apparently not only taught that Jesus had not been a
real person with flesh and blood, but also that salvation had no identifying and
distinguishing features about it. Therefore, throughout the epistle, John presents the
evidence that certain traits do identify one as having an eternal relationship with God the
Father and with Jesus Christ, God’s Son. Furthermore, it proves that those who have this
relationship with the Father and the Son also have a relationship with those who follow
Christ.
The issue of fellowship – 1 John 1:3
In verse 3, John states that he wants his readers to have the same fellowship with the
Father and the Son that he and the other apostles have. In order to understand what John
means we must examine the Biblical meaning of fellowship, especially with God.
The word fellowship means joint-participation. It is used in two separate ways in the
New Testament:
(1) Fellowship between people. It is the result of a common bond and for a common
purpose. The context determines whether the purpose is good or evil and whether it is
permanent or temporary. (See Acts 2:42-46; 2 Corinthians 6:14-18; 1 John 2:19.)
(2) Fellowship with God. The use of this word regarding a relationship between a believer
and God is that it is eternal, changeless, and for the believer’s good. Fellowship with God
is found only four times in the New Testament; three times in this chapter and once in 1
Corinthians 1:9. It is in 1 Corinthians 1:9, when taken in its context, that we discover what
the New Testament teaches about the believer’s fellowship with God.
In 1 Corinthians 1:2-8 Paul identifies those to whom he is writing as having an eternal
relationship with God. He does so in the following ways:
Verse 2 - They are identified as sanctified in Jesus Christ, called to be holy, and those who
have called upon the name of the Lord Jesus (Romans10:12-13).
Verse 6 - They gave testimony that they had believed the message Paul had preached.
Verse 7 - They gave evidence of having received spiritual gifts, and they were eagerly
awaiting the return of the Lord.
Verse 8 - Paul’s assurance that they were believers is underscored when he assures them
that they will be blameless “on the day of our Lord Jesus Christ.”
Verse 9 - Paul reminds them that all these things are true of them and will be true because God had called them into fellowship with His Son. This must mean therefore that
fellowship with God is an eternal relationship. And, because “the gifts and callings of God
are without repentance” (Romans 11:29), Paul’s statements at the beginning of this epistle
are to encourage the saints that their salvation is secure. This eternal relationship with
God guarantees it.
The popular notion that one loses his fellowship with God when he sins is simply not
supported by the Scriptures. Broken fellowship with God is impossible for the one who is
“in Christ.” But then, that only makes sense when one considers all of the scriptures and
uses the words in scripture as the Holy Spirit uses them. Thus, the child of God does not
bounce in and out of fellowship with God. The salvation that Jesus provides is far more
wonderful than that.
Obviously, what the teachers of confession of sin are referring to is a loss of present
communion with the Lord. But according to those who teach confession of sin for
fellowship, the reason for the child of God to confess his sins is in order to restore the
sinning saint to the fellowship he enjoyed before he sinned. And they conclude that
restoration can only come about if their sins are forgiven. But now we see that broken
fellowship is impossible between the believer and God. One would have to lose his
salvation for that to happen and that is impossible.
It is vital that we use Biblical words accurately, and this is not an example of the proper
use of the word fellowship.
There are those who believe that one can lose his salvation and, because they base that
teaching on 1 John 1:9, it shows the danger of the present-day popular interpretation of
that verse. If one could lose his salvation then the accepted teaching regarding the loss of
fellowship would support that belief. If, when I fail to confess my sins, I am not forgiven
and therefore not in fellowship with God, then I would be lost. This fact underscores the
importance of this subject and the need to get it right.
The basis for John’s joy – 1 John 1:4
The joy of John and those with him is another reason John is writing the epistle. Without
an agreement between saints regarding the basic truths of salvation, it is impossible to
have a close and mature spiritual relationship with one another. The joy of the child of God
is increased greatly when he sees other saved brothers and sisters come to the place of
understanding God’s grace. Understanding God’s grace results in close spiritual
fellowship. Fellowship that is so precious to God’s children.
What a different understanding we have of 1 John 1:4 when we clear up the first error
regarding fellowship with God. Fellowship with God, we find, is not on a human level, but
is used here of a relationship that perfectly resembles one who is born into a family. We
have been erroneously taught that sin in the life destroys our fellowship with God, and only
confession of sin restores that relationship. Now we see that God’s Word does not refer to
daily communion with God, but rather, an eternal relationship. It describes God’s work of
joining the sinner, who is now identified as a believer in Christ, to God forever. Gone is the
fear of not being in fellowship with God because of some forgotten sin that was not
confessed. It is no longer seen as a relationship that depends upon whether we keep
“short accounts with God”, but rather on what God did when He placed us in Christ
forever. This will have further implications as we consider the next error in the current
teaching on confession of sin
The fundamental truth – 1 John 1:5
“This is the message we have heard from Him and declare to you: God is light; in Him
there is no darkness at all.”
This is the key verse of 1 John. The fact that God is light means that He is utter holiness,
righteousness, and purity. There is no darkness at all in Him. That is to say, no sin, no
unrighteousness, and no taint whatsoever. There is no grey area with God. Verses 6-10
are measured by the standard presented in verse 5: God’s righteousness and holiness.

Biblical context: contrastive verses
Verses 6-10 are contrastive verses. Verses 6 & 7 are contrasts, while verses 8 & 10 are
contrasted with verse 9. These are all descriptive verses. They do not command anyone to
do anything, but rather, describe the condition of a person if certain things are true of him.
This is a very important truth to keep in mind if we are going to understand the message
taught in these verses.
The truth about light and darkness
In response to 1 John 1:5 which tells us God is light and in Him is NO DARKNESS, 1 John
1:6, 7 deals with light and darkness in a person’s life and how that identifies him. This, like
the use of the word fellowship, is critical to the proper interpretation of this passage. As we
shall see, the proper understanding of the teaching of light and darkness in the New
Testament will establish a very important truth, namely, that the believer always walks in
the light and never walks in darkness. Contrariwise, the unbeliever never walks in the light
but always walks in darkness. Although the believer may do the deeds of darkness, he is
still in the light. His position in the light never changes. Because he is in Christ Who is light
(John 8:12; Colossians 1:12-13), he will never walk in darkness. It is amazing that so
many have taught that, since the epistle was written to believers, verses 6, 8, and 10 are
describing the child of God and therefore prove that he walks in darkness when he sins.
On this basis they find in this chapter the instruction to confess ones sins before they can
walk in the light again. This misunderstanding could easily have been avoided had they
searched the New Testament regarding the teaching of the believer and his relationship to
light and darkness, something I failed to do for years.
Below are some of the basic scriptures that form the teaching regarding light and
darkness.
“When Jesus spoke again to the people, He said, I am the light of the world, whoever
follows Me will never walk in darkness, but will have the light of life.” John 8:12
“But you are a chosen people, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people belonging to
God, that you may declare the praises of Him Who called you out darkness into His
wonderful light.” 1 Peter 2:9
“But you, brothers, are not in darkness so that this day should surprise you like a thief. You
are all sons of the light and sons of the day. We do not belong to the night or the
darkness.” 1 Thessalonians 5:4-5
“Do not be yoked together with unbelievers. For what do righteousness and wickedness
have in common? Or what fellowship can light have with darkness? What harmony is there
between Christ and Belial? What does a believer have in common with an unbeliever? “ 2
Corinthians 6:14-15
“For you were once darkness, but now you are light in the Lord. Live as children of light
(for the fruit of the light consists in all goodness, righteousness and truth).“ Ephesians 5:8
-9
The truth is obvious:
When one believes in Christ he receives Christ’s life which is light. He is placed into the
body of Christ. Because Christ is light, the believer, having been baptized into Christ, is
always in the light. So to say that a child of God can ever be in darkness denies the truth
that Christ is light.
Biblical context: conditional statements
Each of the last five verses in 1 John 1 begins with the words “if we.” In the Greek these
are called third class conditional statements. In effect the statement means: “if we, and we
may or may not.” In other words, the things about which John is writing may or may not
apply to the particular reader. The apparent reason for this is that among the true believers
there were those who were not genuine children of God. What applied to the unbeliever in
verse 6 would not apply to the believer. The opposite would be true in verse 7 and so on.
Many have erroneously concluded that the wording proves that everything that is said in these verses refers to true believers. As we have seen and will continue to see this cannot
possibly be true. The Apostle John is using a literary device. He does so because some
were unsaved among the believers (1 John 2:19, 26; 4:1), while others were undecided
about what constitutes salvation. Hypothetical propositions are presented for each person
to decide objectively whether he is saved or not. The writer to the Hebrews uses this same
device in Hebrews 3-14 and 10:22-31.
The Biblical context is descriptive, not prescriptive
As we have noted, the only scripture used to teach confession of sin to God in the New
Testament is in 1 John 1: 9, “If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just and will forgive
us our sins and purify us from all unrighteousness.“ By no measure can this verse be used
to prescribe a remedy for the sin of the believer because it is not an imperative in the
Greek and is not so even in the English. God is not commanding a person to do
something. Rather, he is describing the actions of someone who comes to the conclusion
that he is a sinner and is guilty as charged by God. This teaching is far different from what
we have been taught and led to believe. 1 John 1:9 addresses the unsaved person who
finally agrees with God about his sin and then places trust in Christ as his sin bearer.
The truth about the context
Having established the foundational truth that God is light and in Him is no darkness at all,
John presents two general categories of people. Those who walk in darkness and are
unsaved (verse 6), and those who walk in the light and are saved (verse 7). A closer
examination of these two verses establishes the basic interpretation of them.
In verse 6 we see that no matter what a person may say, if he is walking in darkness he
does not have an eternal relationship with God through faith in Jesus Christ.
Walking in Darkness - The Characteristics
The book of 1 John gives us some descriptive traits of one who is walking in darkness:
1.He gives no evidence of loving God - 4:20.
2.He does not love the brothers in Christ - 4:20; 2:9,11.
3.He does not keep Christ’s commandments - 2:29; 5:2-3.
4.He loves the world - 2:15.
5.He deserts the brothers - 2:19, 24; 3:14; 4:20.
6.He denies the Son - 2:22-23.
7.He sins as he did before - 3:8,10.
8.He denies that Jesus had a human body - 4:3.
9.He does not believe the record that God gave of His Son - 5:10-12.
Conclusion - These are the traits of an unsaved person - one who is walking in darkness.
In verse 7 we see the continual work of the blood of Christ. The ones who “walk in the
light”, like the ones walking in darkness, will have certain distinguishing characteristics
about their lives:
1.They will carry out the commands of Christ - 2:3, 5, 6.
2.They will love the brothers (fellow believers) - 2:9, 11.
3.They will not love the world for the love of the Father is in them - 2:15; 4, 16,
19.
4.They will not desert the brothers - 2:19; 3:14; 4.
5.They will continue to believe what they started out believing - 2:24.
6.They will keep themselves pure - 3:2-3.
7.They will not sin as they used to - 3:9.
8.They will have compassion on the brothers - 3:16, 19.
0 Comments
Americans Are Most Generous People on Planet Dec 9, 2008 7:53 am
81 Views
by mpress.... chart is pictured

So the next time some Marxist loving Leftist tries to convince you how evil America or the leaders Americans voted for are just remember the US is the most generous country ever in the civilized world bar none. With all the anti American bigotry going around by some Europeans and many Canadians these days maybe it is time for a reality check. Like they say money talks BS walks…mpress

Americans are the most generous people in the world, measured by charitable giving as a percent of GDP. Americans give twice as much (1.67% of GDP) as the next most charitable country, the U.K. at 0.73%, according to this study by the Charities Aid Foundation (chart above is taken from the study). Americans give almost 12 times as much as the French and almost 8 times as much as the Germans. In fact, Americans give more as a percent of GDP than France, Germany, Turkey, New Zealand, Singapore and the Netherlands COMBINED!

And charitable giving in the U.S. set another record in 2006 at almost $300 billion, about the same amount as the GDP of Denmark, Greece, Austria or Norway. source

Washington — The United States is the single largest donor of foreign economic aid, but, unlike many other developed nations, Americans prefer to donate their money through the private sector, according to a new report published by a Washington research organization.

Of the $122.8 billion of foreign aid provided by Americans in 2005 (the most current data available), $95.5 billion, or 79 percent, came from private foundations, corporations, voluntary organizations, universities, religious organizations and individuals, says the annual Index of Global Philanthropy.

The index was issued May 24 by the Center for Global Prosperity at the Hudson Institute, a Washington-based nonpartisan research organization.

“It isn’t like in the 1950s when the Marshall Plan and government flows dominated our economic engagement with the developing world,” said Carol A. Adelman, the director of the Center for Global Prosperity. She spoke May 24 at the launching of the report.

For example, U.S. foundations gave more – in money, time, goods and expertise — than 11 of the 22 developed-country governments each gave in 2005, and U.S. private voluntary organizations totaled more than the governments of Japan, the United Kingdom, Germany and France each.

More than half of all U.S. assistance to developing countries, $61.7 billion, came in the form of private remittances by individuals living in the United States to their families abroad, the report says. According to the report, those remittances not only reduce poverty, but, in some cases, increase creditworthiness of countries and underwrite their trade imbalances. source

Bush Has Quietly Tripled Aid to Africa

The president has tripled direct humanitarian and development aid to the world’s most impoverished continent since taking office and recently vowed to double that increased amount by 2010 — to nearly $9 billion. source

0 Comments
its beginning to happen...already Dec 8, 2008 6:22 am
105 Views
The "messiah" who preached that he had answers to everything from the economy, environment and even make sure that your car and house payments are never a problem to you again has now come out and said that its going to take a long time to fix the economy.

It will never get fixed with social programs that he is planning and higher taxation. That is a drain on an economy. The new deal plan was a drain on the economy.

Until the elections in 2006, this country had the best economy, nation wide in its history. We had 52 straight months of job growth which is a record. Unemployment nationally hovered around 4.5 to 4.7% compared to 6.3% in 2000. The best in the Clinton era was 5.7%

The economic growth was at 3.3% to 3.8% quarterly and that was much better than the Clinton administration which was at 2.4%

When the investment taxes were lowered from 40% that Clinton put up to 15%, people flourished. People invested and money was circulated and spent. Obama wants to raise that back to 30% which would work against the economy.

Oh, but Obama does want to give the wrong people a stimulus package. The last one the house and senate gave out did... um nothing. 1000 dollars for each person does nothing for the economy.Who is paying for it? Think about that. Trickle down economics works. It is not a quick fix. But it allows the people in time to flourish and grow. That creates real jobs and not government jobs that are a strain on the economy.

It worked in President Reagans time and it worked for President Bush. So why the banking mess now? Its on video record Janet Reno threatening banks to be investigated if they did not give out more loans to questionable clients. Its also on video Richard Baker warning of the future issue we have now. He warned about in 2004. President Bush warned the banks in 2004, 2005 2006 2007 2008. In the same video, many Democrats right on video Cspan defend Fanny Mae. Its right there. Now, somehow this mess is equally shared and somehow President Bush's fault. Hogwash.

A Closer look and you find Barrack Obama's economic advisers made millions of dollars in the fiasco. Truth is truth.The buck does have a place to stop. It is not with the President and it is not with the republican party.

So now we have a man as President elect that promised the world. One he has never done anything in. One that he has never fixed one problem along the way. Its like hiring a computer technician that knows nothing about computers and your computer is in need of repairs.

So now he is basically saying he doesn't know how to fix it and somehow its the other guys fault anyway. Good luck with that.
0 Comments
its beginning to happen...already Dec 8, 2008 5:10 am
142 Views
The "messiah" who preached that he had answers to everything from the economy, environment and even make sure that your car and house payments are never a problem to you again has now come out and said that its going to take a long time to fix the economy.

It will never get fixed with social programs that he is planning and higher taxation. That is a drain on an economy. The new deal plan was a drain on the economy.

Until the elections in 2006, this country had the best economy, nation wide in its history. We had 52 straight months of job growth which is a record. Unemployment nationally hovered around 4.5 to 4.7% compared to 6.3% in 2000. The best in the Clinton era was 5.7%

The economic growth was at 3.3% to 3.8% quarterly and that was much better than the Clinton administration which was at 2.4%

When the investment taxes were lowered from 40% that Clinton put up to 15%, people flourished. People invested and money was circulated and spent. Obama wants to raise that back to 30% which would work against the economy.

Oh, but Obama does want to give the wrong people a stimulus package. The last one the house and senate gave out did... um nothing. 1000 dollars for each person does nothing for the economy.Who is paying for it? Think about that. Trickle down economics works. It is not a quick fix. But it allows the people in time to flourish and grow. That creates real jobs and not government jobs that are a strain on the economy.

It worked in President Reagans time and it worked for President Bush. So why the banking mess now? Its on video record Janet Reno threatening banks to be investigated if they did not give out more loans to questionable clients. Its also on video Richard Baker warning of the future issue we have now. He warned about in 2004. President Bush warned the banks in 2004, 2005 2006 2007 2008. In the same video, many Democrats right on video Cspan defend Fanny Mae. Its right there. Now, somehow this mess is equally shared and somehow President Bush's fault. Hogwash.

A Closer look and you find Barrack Obama's economic advisers made millions of dollars in the fiasco. Truth is truth.The buck does have a place to stop. It is not with the President and it is not with the republican party.

So now we have a man as President elect that promised the world. One he has never done anything in. One that he has never fixed one problem along the way. Its like hiring a computer technician that knows nothing about computers and your computer is in need of repairs.

So now he is basically saying he doesn't know how to fix it and somehow its the other guys fault anyway. Good luck with that.
4 Comments
Mercy is in the hospital again Dec 7, 2008 7:39 am
207 Views
she sounds bad. The Malaria is bad
10 Comments
Some Facts regarding who started the banking mess that you should want to know Dec 7, 2008 1:36 am
143 Views
Go to You Tube:

Search:

EVIDENCE FOUND!!! Clinton administration's "BANK AFFIRMATIVE ACTION" They forced banks to make BAD LOANS and ACORN and Obama's tie to all of it!!!

yes its a long tittle and its maker is NakedEmporerNews

Second Search:

Shocking Video Unearthed Democrats in their own words Covering up the Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac Scam that caused our Economic Crisis

yes another long title, just copy and paste! Same author, NakedEmporerNews

These are right out of the perpetrators mouths much of it on cspan
0 Comments
Hitlers Speech 1941 Dec 6, 2008 12:03 pm
206 Views
This speech does not sound like the madman people represent him of being. He is intelligent, yet if one looks closely at what he is saying; in particular later on in the speech it reminds one of our President Elect.

Here is the transcript:
7 Comments
So Godly cook Dec 6, 2008 10:11 am
159 Views
have you repented of your obvious racism?
0 Comments
A Pastor worth listening to Dec 6, 2008 10:10 am
156 Views
Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson is the most courageous, outspoken critic of the civil-rights establishment in America today. Often referred to as the “antidote to Jesse Jackson”, Rev. Peterson is also the man behind the National Boycott of the NAACP, believing the organization to be nothing more than a tool of the “elite, socialist” elements of the Democratic Party.

Rev. Peterson is the Founder and President of the nationally recognized nonprofit organization BOND, the Brotherhood Organization of A New Destiny, whose purpose is “Rebuilding the Family By Rebuilding the Man”. He is also the author of the bold and highly-popular book, “SCAM: How the Black Leadership Exploits Black America.” Rev. Peterson is also a nationally-syndicated radio host, TV host and highly sought-after speaker.

Jesse is frequently seen on major TV networks such as Fox, CNN, and MSNBC, consistently leaving his liberal counterpart in knots. His unflappable, can-do attitude and absolute commitment to truth are the perfect medicine for a value-challenged society.

An exceptionally charismatic speaker, Rev. Peterson is a hit among audiences nationwide. Among his popular titles: “Rebuilding the Family By Rebuilding the Man,” “Curing Moral Poverty,” “White Fear”, “Stop Reparations & Affirmative Action Now!” , Abortion-Black Genocide, “The Left’s War on the Family”, “We Shall Overcome Civil Rights Leaders” and “The Seven Guaranteed Steps to Spiritual, Family and Financial Success”. There’s more!

Character is the most important word in Rev. Peterson's vocabulary. Born on a plantation in Midway, Alabama, Rev. Peterson is this generation's Booker T. Washington. Jesse practices what he preaches, operating the BOND Home For Boys, a character building after-school program, and many other programs and activities that benefit men and their families. His organization is a prototype for a bold new approach to solving our ever-increasing urban crisis.
4 Comments
Rev. Peterson: Black Preachers are Worshiping the Wrong Messiah Dec 6, 2008 10:05 am
133 Views
…There shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies…2 Peter 2:1

LOS ANGELES, Nov. 13 /Christian Newswire/ — With the November 4 election of Barack Obama, black preachers have been celebrating across the country. Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson, Founder and President of BOND Action, Inc. is rebuking these black preachers for their part in electing the most left-wing presidential candidate in American history:

“Ninety-six percent of black voters supported Barack Obama and the majority of these voters were influenced by black preachers to put race ahead of their country and their faith,” said Rev. Peterson. “How can ministers who are supposed to lead their flock to Jesus Christ instead lead them to a socialist like Obama? The truth is that most black ministers don’t have a real relationship with God and they are leading their congregations to hell. These blind leaders helped elect their black ‘Messiah’. This ‘Messiah’ happens to be the most left-wing member of the U.S. Senate,” said Rev. Peterson.

Here’s where president-elect Obama stands on key issues:

* Believes in abortion on demand (virtually under any circumstance), and has told Planned Parenthood that sex-ed for kindergartners is ‘the right thing to do’ (as long as it’s ‘age appropriate’);

* Has promised to repeal the federal Defense of Marriage Act and would allow homosexual ‘marriages’ to be made legal in all 50 states;

* Would appoint far left activist judges who’d pervert and misinterpret the U.S. Constitution;

* Has pledged to dismantle ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ in the military. Supports open homosexuality, bisexuality, and transexuality in all military branches, barracks and shower facilities.

This is what influential black ministers said after the Obama election victory:

* Bishop T.D. Jakes of The Potter’s House church said that Sen. Barack Obama’s campaign “encouraged, validated and gave inspiration to not only the people of the United States of America, but to the people of our world.”

* At Harlem’s Abyssinian Baptist Church, Rev. Calvin Butts invited his congregation to stand up “and give God praise for the election.” Several hundred churchgoers rose as one and cheered, “Yes we can! Yes we can!”

* Grammy-winning gospel singer, Rev. Shirley Caesar-Williams said, “Too long we’ve been at the bottom of the totem pole, but he [Obama] has vindicated us, hallelujah.”

* Rev. John L. Lambert, Bethel AME Church in Indianapolis, “If ever there was an answer to ‘who cometh to our help?’ that was the answer…Look at what God has done.”

* At Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago, Rev. Otis Moss, III, said history would note that Trinity was the holy place where “God stirred a young man’s soul and put him on the path to the presidency.”

Rev. Peterson added: “For the past eighteen years I’ve said that most black preachers are not called by God, but instead are called by their mammas. If there was ever a time that this was the case, that time is now. In order for black Americans to turn around, they must drop their anger, and find the truth within themselves, not from corrupt, racist preachers or from a false black Messiah.”
0 Comments
1 2 3 4 5 ... 10 11 12 13 14 ... 100 ... 177 178 179

To link to this blog (Tropical_Man) use [blog Tropical_Man] in your messages.
52 M
Guidelines
January 2009
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1
  		2
1
3
 
4
3
5
  		6
7
7
  		8
  		9
  		10
 
11
  		12
  		13
  		14
  		15
  		16
  		17
 
18
  		19
  		20
  		21
  		22
  		23
  		24
 
25
  		26
  		27
  		28
  		29
  		30
  		31
 

Recent Visitors
VisitorAgeSexDate
GodsKyWoman 45F1/8
teddy672 31M1/8
momto3beagles40F1/7
luvslighhouses22 50F1/7
Claudia_T 51F1/7
longing4more49F1/6
reallysaved2 50F1/6
whisper85 34F1/6
knowTheTruth36M1/6
orchid1002 43F1/5
Most Recent Comments by Others
PostPosterPost Date
to them of whoom we do not speakTropical_ManJan 7 9:07 pm
Seventh Day Adventist Experiencelonging4moreJan 7 11:44 am
Capitalism and the Financial CrisisSkariff2Jan 7 11:13 am
the worst liechocnrosesJan 4 9:32 pm
Letters of TruthTropical_ManDec 29 1:19 am
who came up with this "Soul Sleep nonsense?momto3beaglesDec 28 8:53 am
Paul and the LawClaudia_TDec 28 7:01 am
Men abuseTropical_ManDec 28 6:38 am
12 Myths and Insightful Special Reports on the Facts about Domestic AbuseTropical_ManDec 28 6:35 am
Jesus plus anything equals a lieClaudia_TDec 27 4:49 am
Is the Seventh-day Adventist Church a Cult?Claudia_TDec 25 11:55 pm