Advertisement
Bringing people together in love and faith
My Blog
Blogs > Tropical_Man > Mercy
Mercy
  
Hope

Exploring Psychology and Meds

Apologetics

The Rest of the Gospel

Names of International scammers
Title View |
Rational People know Mar 26, 2008 4:47 pm
110 Views
Rational people, uninfected by Liberalism, know that Americans have always been able to own guns, and only the crazies or criminals abuse that right -- and that banning guns would not remove those elements from society.

Rational people know that skin color and ancestry are immaterial when it comes to intelligence and potential -- both distributed evenly throughout the human race. Above all, rational people know that LIFE IS NOT FAIR... that in any field of human endeavor, some people will rise above others, and that life is competitive.

Why do Liberals want to cripple children by lying to them about life instead of preparing them for it? It's the sign of a mental disease. Do you wonder why school shootings have become so common? It's what happens when those coddled kids raised in an unrealistic world, believing that everyone's the same, get a bloody nose when they run into the reality that the good-looking football players get to date the cheerleaders, and they don't.

Joe Mariani
0 Comments
biggest worry Mar 26, 2008 4:41 pm
111 Views
My biggest worry is this: if Liberalism becomes correctly classified as a mental illness, are they going to claim special rights, priveleges, and Federal funding? Are there going to be programs to force businesses to hire their quota of Liberals, under the "Americans with Disabilities Act"?

------------

Joe Mariani
0 Comments
New Vaccine Discovered To Prevent Liberal Stupidity .... no seriously Mar 26, 2008 1:26 pm
107 Views
Chris Davis

Houston, TX—In what may be the biggest medical breakthrough of the millennium, Dr. “Red” Duke claims to have discovered a vaccine that will prevent liberal stupidity. The vaccine, currently in the throws of a study, is reported to stop the spread of absurdities and other abnormalities associated with liberalism.

In some cases, Dr. Duke notes, the rampant disease can be halted altogether, giving hope to many families that have given up on ever finding a cure for their relatives. Testing, according to Dr. Duke, was done largely on monkeys, because of the similar characteristics between monkeys and liberals. The incessant, childish behavior, he explained, was the key to the link between monkeys and liberals.

Unlike the new obesity vaccine—which leaves reasonable doubt to its validity—this vaccine is reported to definitively trim the level of stupidity that many liberal families suffer from on a daily basis. Dr. Duke explains that he advanced on the problem as if it were a neurological disorder, that the target of the vaccine was to attack the useless, lazy cells that were attached to liberal spines, creating a moody, depressed person that is generally unengaged, unemployed and doesn’t care about society.

The vaccine, according to Dr. Duke, transformed the useless cells—referred to as liberal cells—into active, productive cells, creating a more animated and engaged monkey. After five and a half long years, Dr. Duke thinks that his tireless research has come to fruition.

Basically, Dr. Duke details, that during the experiment, they took six monkeys and placed them in front of the television with the usual liberal propaganda on network news. They showed them ABC, CBS, NBC and CNN, and, according to Dr. Duke, the monkeys remained mesmerized, almost as if they were zombies, until after the injection of the vaccine to four of them.

“After thirty days, the four monkeys that were given the vaccine wouldn’t watch network news,” Dr. Duke said. “It was amazing, a real breakthrough in science. The possibilities are endless. I’ve already asked for volunteers from The New York Times. Every one of them should be injected immediately!”

If it works on New York Times’ reporters, Dr. Duke thinks that it should be recommended to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for immediate circulation in New York, Massachusetts, California, and liberal states across the nation.

Dr. Duke does admit, however, that takers of the vaccine would suffer some odd side effects. He noted that the vaccine takers would suffer from an enlarged backbone, they would stop picking their nose, start working regularly, and became more engaged via logging onto the internet.

“All of the monkeys began logging onto a site called Free Republic to get most of their news. Some of them even posted. Other times they began listening to the Rush Limbaugh Show,” he states. “It was awe inspiring. To see these monkeys go from a near zombie, to an informed group, almost brought me to tears. Just imagine what we can do with the U.S. Senate.”

“The vaccine is a very novel approach for the treatment of liberalism,” says Mattias Chop, a liberal researcher at the University of Columbia. “This could save America. I think we owe Dr. Duke a big thank you, and a steak dinner. You can’t pay a man enough for something like this. Keep up the great work!”

“I hope this vaccine works,” cried Maureen Bittle, a housewife from Boston, MA. “I can’t get my 35-year old to get off the couch. All he does is sit there and watch shows like Fear Factor. I’ve even threatened to kick him out of the house, but all he says is that it’s Bush’s fault that he can’t get a job. You’ve given me so much hope, Dr. Duke. Don’t stop now!”

“I think Senator Ted Kennedy should be the first senator we test it on,” stated Sen. Jon Kyl, R-AZ. “He’s definitely ripe for the vaccine. Bring it on, Dr. Duke!”

These findings mark a turning point in the treatment of liberalism by confirming the effectiveness of vaccinations to combat this serious and growing American problem. In his quest to end liberalism, Dr. “Red” Duke has taken a leap that may have saved the country from further disease, a disease that has created liberal stupidity across the nation.
0 Comments
how to throw a sinker Mar 26, 2008 1:16 pm
103 Views
Most of the time, you'll want to throw a sinker with your fingers parallel with the seams. Sometimes, depending on finger pressure, it could be on one seam or it could be on the other seam.

A lot of guys throw a sinker off of the middle finger. The movement is down and late. It sinks, for a righthanded pitcher, into a righthander, and away from a lefthander.

For a lefthander, it's into a lefthander, away from a righthander.

Steve Wallace
0 Comments
How to throw a spitball Mar 26, 2008 1:13 pm
100 Views
A spitball is a pitch where the baseball is loaded up with saliva or other substance in order to make it move differently. A well-thrown spitter can be a wicked pitch that dances wildly, making it un-hittable by most hitters. Spitballs have long been outlawed in Major League Baseball. But that doesn’t mean the art of this juicy pitch has been forgotten.

Step 1:
Use deception when throwing the spitter. According to former Milwaukee Brewers manager George Bamberger, the best way to hide a spitball is to fake all of the tricks. Make them think you have lubricant under your cap, an emery board in your glove or soap on your jersey. Everyone will be so busy making sure you don’t cheat, they’ll miss you spitting on your hand!

Step 2:
Prepare your baseball. There are generally two ways to throw a spitter. The first is to place spit on one side of the baseball and throw it like a fastball. The second is to lube up the ball and grip it without touching the seams. Then as you release the pitch, squeeze your fingers and thumb together, allowing it to squirt out rather than roll off your fingertips.

Step 3:
Experiment with different substances. Pitchers from all eras have mixed saliva with other illegal substances to improve their game. Some examples include using sweat, ear wax, soap, mud, emery boards, tacks, sandpaper, pine tar or anything that affects the basic trajectory of the pitch.

Step 4:
Have an accomplice. Make sure your catcher knows when you will be throwing your spitball. A good catcher can quickly wipe off the baseball or make sure the umpire is too busy to notice an occasional wet one.

ehow
0 Comments
Why President Bush will go down in history as a great President and Clinton will not Mar 26, 2008 10:57 am
105 Views
Why President Bush will go down in history as a great President and Bill Clinton will not
When you think of great presidents - certain events have defined their presidency. George Washington is remembered for being the first president, a general and the father of our country. Franklin Roosevelt is remembered for his leadership during World War II, the New Deal and being elected to four terms. John F. Kennedy is remember for the Bay of Pigs and also for his assassination- which was captured on film. However- recently- he is being remembered for his affairs. Ronald Reagan is remember for his tax cuts and ending the Cold War. Abraham Lincoln - who many consider our greatest president - is remembered for abolishing slavery, saving the union and his assassination.

Does anyone know the poll numbers of John Kennedy? Does anyone know who FDR nominated to the Supreme Court? Does anyone know the scandals that plagued FDR? Does anyone know what the critics said about Lincoln?

Most people remember two or three defining moments about a presidency. In fact- most people today- don't even know much about the current state of politics. Take a poll and you will find that most people will not know the Senate Majority Leader, the Speaker of the House, the members of the Supreme Court or their own representatives. Taking all of this into account- what do you think will be remembered about President George W. Bush 100 to 400 years from now?

President Bush will be remembered for his leadership after the attacks on 9/11. Remember when he was down in the rubble of the Twin Towers and he shouted- "I can hear you, the rest of the world can hear you and the people who knocked these buildings down will hear all of us soon." He will be remember for that picture with his arm around the fire chief. He will be remember for his war on terror and his terror doctrine. He will be remembered for two wars that liberated 50 million people- who were able to vote within two years - at a cost of 4,000 lives . Please note that President Lincoln freed four million slaves at a cost of close to 500,000 lives. And the people who were liberated from slavery still could not vote for almost 100 years. At that time of Lincoln- it took days for news to travel across the United States. Today- news travels around the world in an instant. At the time of Lincoln- it took days and weeks to travel between different countries. Today- it is done within hours. One hundred years from now- the world will only become smaller. As a result- President Bush's legacy will be remembered across the world- because it is a smaller world.

So to all these people like Barbra Streisand that call President Bush a terrible president.- please note that his legacy will not be Karl Rove, Harriett Miers, WMD's or the personal attacks on him. Does anyone really think that 100 years from now that anyone is going to remember the day to day details of his presidency? How many people today know about the Gulf of Tonken?

Now let me ask - what will be the legacy of Bill Clinton? What were his major accomplishments? A strong economy? How many presidents are considered great - because of the economy during their presidency? I would say none. However- some are forgotten- because of a poor economy during their presidency. President Herbert Hoover is forgotten - because of the Great Depression and more recently Jimmy Carter will be forgotten. I would say that Clinton is going to remembered most for his affair with Monica Lewinsky while in office and his impeachment. What other defining moments did Clinton have beside all his scandals such as Vince Foster, Whitewater Paula Jones, Kathleen Willey, Jaunita Broaddrick, travelgate pardongate.......

Two hundred years from now Bill Clinton will be remembered as a great politician that had an affair with an intern and was impeached and George W. Bush will be remembered as a president that freed 50 million people from tyranny and tried to spread freedom throughout the world.

Written by Thomas George
0 Comments
Why a Christian should never be a Democrat Mar 26, 2008 10:52 am
86 Views
Why a Christian should never be a Democrat

One of the platforms of the Democratic Party is the position of Pro Choice. Pro Choice is the support of abortion- including partial birth abortion with no restriction.

Partial birth abortion is a method of late-term (after 20 weeks or 5 months) abortion that terminates a pregnancy and results in the death of a partially born child. The brain of the child is removed as it is being born in order to terminate the life.

Democrats (liberals) argue that partial birth abortion is a valid procedure when the mother's HEALTH is in danger. Republicans (conservatives) argue that the procedure should only be used if the mother's LIFE is in danger. The conservative position is the correct one! There is no place in established law that allows a person to take another life if only your health is in danger.

Think of the consequences if this standard were applied to everyday life. If you have a cold- by speaking with you- my health becomes endangered- does this mean that I have the right to take your life? The standard would create chaos. It makes no sense!

Strange - liberals that are for the death penalty of an innocent child as it is being born - are against the death penalty for those found guilty of heinous crimes against innocent people?

However- more importantly- why would anyone belong to a party that supports the termination of a life of an innocent child as it is being born. An unborn child is the most defenseless of all people in society. They cannot protect themselves and so we should do everything we can to protect them! There are organizations that support racism, discrimination and hatred- would you have a membership in them? No? Why then would you want to belong to an organization that supports the unrestricted killing of innocent children as they are being born?

It is estimated that more than 4,000 partial birth abortions take place in the United States each year.

Want to save the life of an unborn child- vote conservative……

For this reason and this reason alone- a Christian should never be a Democrat!

Written by Thomas George
boycottliberalism
0 Comments
DeM(CALVINISM)oNiC Mar 26, 2008 8:42 am
2222 Views
Calvinism

A Calvinist is a person who subscribes to the theological beliefs of John Calvin, the Swiss Protestant reformer of the sixteenth century. There are five main points in Calvinism, four of which are false teachings. The five points of Calvinism are usually represented by the letters T.U.L.I.P.

The "T" is for TOTAL DEPRAVITY. This is the false doctrine that man is so depraved that he cannot even see his sinful condition and call upon God for salvation. It is true that all men are natural-born sinners (Rom. 3:23; 5:12; Psa. 51:5), but it is also true that God COMMANDS all men to repent and receive Christ (Acts 17:30-31; I John 3:23; Luke 13:3). Man is indeed depraved, but he isn't so depraved that he has no free will of his own (II Pet. 3:9; Jn. 1:12; 3:16; Jos. 24:15; Exo. 35:5, 21, 22, 29). Total Depravity is heresy.

"U" stands for UNCONDITIONAL ELECTION, which is a heresy derived from perverting verses like Ephesians 1:4-5 and Romans 8:29. The Calvinists believe that God predestinated everyone way back before Genesis 1:1, totally ignoring their free will to choose for themselves. That is, He supposedly decided who would go to Heaven and who would go to Hell long before anyone was even born. If you'll read Romans 8:29 and I Peter 1:1-2 you'll see that God's election is based on FOREKNOWLEDGE. He didn't elect to save or damn anyone against their free will. God knew all along who would choose Christ and who would not, and He made His "elections" based on that information.

Then we have the "L" for LIMITED ATONEMENT. This is the belief that only a limited number of people can be washed from their sins in the precious blood of Christ, because only "the elect" will be saved anyhow. The idea is that Christ loved the church and gave Himself for it (Eph. 5:25); so the blood of Christ was only shed for the church. This is foolishness. I Timothy 2:6 says that Christ gave Himself a ransom for ALL, not just the elect. ALL have sinned (Rom. 3:23); so He died for ALL, and He saves "as many as" receive Him (John 1:12).

The "I" stands for IRRESISTIBLE GRACE, which is also false doctrine. This teaching says that God the Holy Spirit overpowers the sinner and grants him the new birth without his submission or positive response. As we've already seen, man DOES have a free will and no one is saved without CHOOSING to believe on Christ as Lord and Saviour. There is no such thing as irresistible grace. God has given us all the ability to resist anyone or anything we choose (Acts 7:51; II Tim. 3:8; Jas. 4). There are times when the convicting power of the Holy Spirit is so strong and real that a sinner sees no choice but to give in to God and receive Christ as Saviour, but the sinner always has a choice. No one is saved against their will, and no one is saved without first choosing to receive Christ.

The last letter is "P," which represents the PERSEVERANCE OF THE SAINTS. This is the only point in "T.U.L.I.P" which is anywhere near correct. Once a sinner receives Christ, he is predestinated to be conformed to Christ's image (Rom. 8:29). That is, as Christians, we are eternally secure and cannot lose the salvation which God has freely given us.

James Melton
329 Comments (Page:1 2)
Baptism of the Holy Ghost and Fire Mar 26, 2008 8:37 am
100 Views
Baptism of the Holy Ghost and Fire

Most Charismatic groups teach that a person receives the Holy Ghost sometime AFTER they've received Christ as Saviour, but this is plain heresy. Romans 8:9 tells us that a person does not even belong to Christ if that person doesn't have the Spirit of God, so salvation and the baptism of the Holy Ghost are SYNONYMOUS, not separate.

To further the confusion, such groups also refer to this event as a "baptism of fire". The only baptism of fire in the Bible is the one that John spoke of when he spoke of Christ burning sinners in UNQUENCHABLE fire (Mat. 3:11-12). The only time a person is baptized in fire is when he is cast into the LAKE of fire (Rev. 20:14-15). Believers are baptized with the Holy Ghost, but sinners are baptized with fire.

James Melton
0 Comments
In America....Learn English or get out! Mar 26, 2008 8:26 am
128 Views
That was the consensous tuesday at the rally held in Tallahasse Florida. Speakers spoke in English and then in Spanish. I am sorry, this America. We need our heritage back. We need to stop speaking Spanish in our State houses.

This is very offensive. Spanish people come to this country and dishonor it by not abiding by who we are. English Speaking and constitutional abiding.

Yesterday did it for me on immigration. I kept my mouth shut when there, but many people did not. They were infurriated and I do not blame them.

Coming here illegally should first be a warning and a stamp put on them. If they come back in after they have been tagged and warned. I am for the death penalty on this. That is the only way people will listen. There is due process and we need to follow this.

If I went to their country I would respect their culture and not dishonor it like these people are ours. Your culture is not our culture.
2 Comments
1 2 3 4 5 ... 100 ... 117 118 119 120 121 ... 130 ... 140 ... 157 158 159

To link to this blog (Tropical_Man) use [blog Tropical_Man] in your messages.
52 M
Guidelines
November 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
5
2
3
3
  		4
4
5
5
6
8
7
6
8
3
9
6
10
5
11
8
12
2
13
2
14
  		15
 
16
  		17
1
18
2
19
6
20
12
21
4
22
 
23
  		24
  		25
  		26
  		27
  		28
  		29
 
30
  		           

Recent Visitors
VisitorAgeSexDate
Merlinhawk 36M11/21
Louisiana41F11/21
DannyRay66 42M11/21
hmcsb42M11/21
1god2 48F11/20
luvslighhouses22 50F11/20
kiadan 33F11/19
deric16946M11/19
christianfemale26F11/19
BelovedByHim 46F11/19
Most Recent Comments by Others
PostPosterPost Date
Man nabbed after hitting girlfriend with sandwichVerybusybeeNov 21 11:09 am
Why Creflo Dollar Needs His DollarsMerlinhawkNov 21 7:43 am
Do not lose hopeVerybusybeeNov 21 6:35 am
Barack Loves Jesus AgainTropical_ManNov 21 4:24 am
strange but true.... job interview behaviorTropical_ManNov 20 1:55 pm
thank You LordMerlinhawkNov 20 4:41 am
a heads upTropical_ManNov 19 7:04 pm
I really need your PrayersTropical_ManNov 19 4:37 pm
would you live your life "Next"?Tropical_ManNov 19 3:58 pm
Went and saw "Dark Knight" again!Tropical_ManNov 19 3:55 pm
Here is an example of misleading people on Gas PricesTropical_ManNov 19 3:54 pm