|
Yom Kippur -- The Day of Atonement -- An annual Sabbath
|
Sep 28, 2009 1:42 pm
499 Views
|
Today is Yom Kippur. One of the most holiest day of the year for Jews. It is a day of fasting and it is also an annual Sabbath day.
Leviticus 23: 31-32
"You must not do any work at all! This is a permanent law for you, and it must be observed from generation to generation wherever you live. This will be a Sabbath day of complete rest for you, and on that day you must deny yourselves"
A question for those of you who keep the weekly sabbath, as I once did. If you keep the weekly sabbath by commandment, do you also keep the annual sabbath? Note above -- This is a permanent law...
The command says its permanent. If the weekly sabbath is permanent shouldn't the annual sabbath days be permanent as well and kept?
|
|
|
1
comment
|
|
|
Wow, this is so cool -- Egyptain coins have been found carrying the name of Joseph.
|
Sep 27, 2009 8:19 am
570 Views
|
Egyptian paper: Coins found bearing name of Joseph
Posted: September 26, 2009
11:30 pm Eastern 2009 WorldNetDaily
Egyptian coins carrying the name of Joseph, the biblical patriarch whose arrival in Egypt as a slave eventually provided salvation for his family during decades of drought across the Middle East, have been discovered in a cache of antique items shelved in boxes in a museum, according to a new report.
The report from the Middle East Media Research Institute said the coins with Joseph's name and image were found in a pile of unsorted artifacts that had been stored at the Museum of Egypt.
MEMRI, which monitors and translates reports from Middle East publications and broadcasters, said the original report was in Egypt's Al Ahram newspaper in Cairo.
The newspaper said the discovery countered claims by some historians that coins were not used for trade in Egypt at the time the Bible records Joseph and the Jews migrated there. Those historians have argued that trade was done by barter.
But researchers told the newspaper the minting dates of the coins in the cache have been matched to the period in which Joseph was recorded to be in Egypt.
"A thorough examination revealed that the coins bore the year in which they were minted and their value, or effigies of the pharaohs [who ruled] at the time of their minting. Some of the coins are from the time when Joseph lived in Egypt, and bear his name and portrait," said the newspaper report.
The report carried an explanation of the discovery by a team involving researcher Sa'id Muhammad Thabet:
"Studies by Dr. Thabet's team have revealed that what most archeologists took for a kind of charm, and others took for an ornament or adornment, is actually a coin. Several [facts led them to this conclusion]: first, [the fact that] many such coins have been found at various [archeological sites], and also [the fact that] they are round or oval in shape, and have two faces: one with an inscription, called the inscribed face, and one with an image, called the engraved face – just like the coins we use today," said the report.
The newspaper called the find "unprecedented" and said, "The researchers discovered the coins when they sifted through thousands of small archeological artifacts stored in [the vaults of] the Museum of Egypt."
The Egyptian newspaper noted that the Quran indicates clearly "that coins were used in Egypt in the time of Joseph."
The report continued, "Research team head Dr. Sa'id Muhammad Thabet said that during his archeological research on the Prophet Joseph, he had discovered in the vaults of the [Egyptian] Antiquities Authority and of the National Museum many charms from various eras before and after the period of Joseph, including one that bore his effigy as the minister of the treasury in the Egyptian pharaoh's court.
The report continued, "According to Dr. Thabet, his studies are based on publications about the Third Dynasty, one of which states that the Egyptian coin of the time was called a deben and was worth one-fourth of a gram of gold. This coin is mentioned in a letter by a man named Thot-Nehet, a royal inspector of the Nile bridges. In letters to his son, he mentioned leasing lands in return for deben-coins and agricultural produce."
The report explained that other texts from the Third, Sixth and Twelfth Dynasties also talk about coins.
"The archeological finding is also based on the fact that the inscribed face bore the name of Egypt, a date, and a value, while the engraved face bore the name and image of one of the ancient Egyptian pharaohs or gods, or else a symbol connected with these. Another telling fact is that the coins come in different sizes and are made of different materials, including ivory, precious stones, copper, silver, gold, etc." the newspaper reported.
The museum research uncovered 500 of the coins "carelessly" stored in boxes.
One even had the image of a cow "symbolizing Pharaoh's dream about the seven fat cows and seven lean cows, and the seven green stalks of grain and seven dry talks of grain," the report said.
"Joseph's name appears twice on this coin, written in hieroglyphs: once the original name, Joseph, and once his Egyptian name, Saba Sabani, which was given to him by Pharaoh when he became treasurer. There is also an image of Joseph, who was part of the Egyptian administration at the time," the report said.
|
|
|
4
Comments
|
|
|
Meet me at the Poll ?
|
Sep 26, 2009 6:44 am
437 Views
|
Once a year, near the beginning of the school year, junior/high school students meet at the flag poll, on school grounds, and pray.
I was wondering if this was a local event or has anyone else heard of this happening in your area?
|
|
|
5
Comments
|
|
|
Prophecy author says, Russia will not invade Isreal -- look for an Islamic Antichrist.
|
Sep 23, 2009 1:21 pm
333 Views
|
Ten to fifteen years ago I would of never considered such an idea, but with the rise of Islam I am thinking Islam will be playing more of an end time role than I ever thought before.
***************************************************************
New spin of Ezekiel's wheel: Russia will not invade Israel
Prophecy author has new interpretation of identities of Bible's Gog and Magog
Posted: September 06, 2009
8:53 pm Eastern © 2009 WorldNetDaily
The author of a best-selling Bible prophecy book has a new spin on the old interpretation of two chapters of Ezekiel that most pre-millennial scholars believe suggests a last-days invasion of Israel and the Middle East by a coalition of nations led by Russia.
Joel Richardson, author of "The Islamic Antichrist," says Ezekiel 38 and 39 have been misinterpreted to point a finger at Russia a notion widely popularized during the Cold War days of the old Soviet Union.
"Gog is not a present or future leader from Russia," writes Richardson in a commentary today in WND. "Russia is not spoken of in biblical prophecy. Despite all of the hype and discussion that has been devoted in recent years to casting Russia as the leader of a soon-coming invasion of Israel, the Bible nowhere expresses any such thing. No doubt, I will not make very many friends in my own community by doing so. I may even get a few e-mails accusing me of secretly working for Vladimir Putin himself. But my calling involves the exposition and teaching of what the Bible teaches, not what the consensus is among my contemporary colleagues."
On many points, Richardson agrees with conventional Christian thinking on the endtimes. Like other prophecy teachers, he agrees that the Bible clearly predicts just prior to the return of Christ that the nation of Israel will enter into a comprehensive peace treaty or "covenant" with surrounding nations. He agrees that the covenant will be mediated by the man who Christians call "the Antichrist." The result, he says, will be a false sense of peace and security for the Jewish nation. Three and a half years after this peace treaty is established, the Beast of Revelation will violate the treaty and invade the land of Israel, Richardson writes. Jesus will return during Israel's darkest hour "the time of Jacob's trouble" to save the nation and re-establish the throne of King David on Mount. Zion, ruling over the world with "a rod of iron," he agrees.
But most pre-millennial prophecy teachers have held that Israel will be invaded by another powerful enemy some years before these climactic events. They interpret passages from Ezekiel 38 and 39 as describing this separate war led by a leader known as "Gog from the land of Magog."
Richardson, however, says this invasion is the very same war known as "the battle of Armageddon" and "Gog" is simply another name for the Antichrist.
"But here’s the kicker God Himself directly addresses 'Gog,'" he writes. "And speaking to Gog, God says that he is the same evil last days invader that all of the former prophets spoke about. In fact, it would have been difficult for God to be any clearer."
That passage is Ezekiel 38:17: "Thus saith the Lord GOD; Art thou he of whom I have spoken in old time by my servants the prophets of Israel, which prophesied in those days many years that I would bring thee against them?"
"So here's the question that needs to be asked: If Gog is Russia, and if all of the former prophets spoke about Russia, then why is there not one single passage anywhere in the Bible that speaks about Russia?" Richardson asks rhetorically. "In fact, I challenge anyone who teaches that Gog is Russia to come forth with a single verse outside of Ezekiel that speaks of Russia. And although I am no prophet myself, I can confidently predict that no one will rise to the challenge, simply because there are no passages to bring forward."
Further, Richardson points out, that following the defeat of Gog and Magog, Ezekiel 39:22 predicts, from that day forward, Israel will turn to God and know Him an event most other pre-millennialists agree happens only after the defeat of the Antichrist.
"So the house of Israel shall know that I am the LORD their God from that day and forward."
Again, Richardson asks: "If these events take place a few years before the emergence of the Antichrist, then how could God say that His name would no longer be profaned? The Bible is clear, after all, that the Antichrist will be the leader of the greatest and most blasphemous religious movement that the world has ever or will ever know."
Richardson's book is turning the prophecy world upside down.
The first edition of his book has sold out and is now into its second printing after release only one month after its release, where it debuted at the top of the top of the religious charts at Amazon and among all books at Scribd an online e-booker retailer.
The student of Islam and the Middle East says that after decades of reading popular prophecy books and even best-selling fiction like the "Left Behind" series, millions of evangelical Christians around the world are expecting the Antichrist to emerge from a revived Roman Empire, which many have assumed is associated with the Roman Catholic Church and the European Union.
Not so, argues Richardson. His book makes the case that the biblical Antichrist is one and the same as the Quran's Muslim Mahdi.
"The Bible abounds with proofs that the Antichrist's empire will consist only of nations that are, today, Islamic," says Richardson. "Despite the numerous prevailing arguments for the emergence of a revived European Roman empire as the Antichrist's power base, the specific nations the Bible identifies as comprising his empire are today all Muslim."
Richardson believes the key error of many previous prophecy scholars involves the misinterpretation of a prediction by Daniel to Babylonian King Nebuchadnezzar. Daniel describes the rise and fall of empires of the future, leading to the endtimes. Western Christians have viewed one of those empires as Rome, when, claims Richardson, Rome never actually conquered Babylon and was thus disqualified as a possibility.
It had to be another empire that rose and fell and rose again that would lead to rule of this "man of sin," described in the Bible. That empire, he says, is the Islamic Empire, which did conquer Babylon and, in fact, rules over it even today.
Many evangelical Christians believe the Bible predicts a charismatic ruler, the Antichrist, will arise in the last days, before the return of Jesus. The Quran also predicts that a man, called the Mahdi, will rise up to lead the nations, pledging to usher in an era of peace. Richardson makes the case these two men are, in fact, one in the same.
|
|
|
1
comment
|
|
|
Calvinism?
|
Sep 12, 2009 6:52 am
459 Views
|
I'm not trying to create a big stir, but interested in some basic information. I have a general idea of Calvinism and plan to do a study into it.
Power Points: (sounds pretty cool doesn't it)
1. In your own words, give me a brief idea of Calvinism.
2. In your defense of Calvinism give me a few scriptures that support the doctrine.
3. If you oppose Calvinism, give me a few scriptures that supports your opposition to the doctrine.
Please don't ramble on and on. Keep it simple.
|
|
|
16
Comments
|
|
|
You go Gurl ...
|
Aug 8, 2009 12:04 pm
494 Views
|
One day a 6 year old girl was sitting in a classroom. The teacher was going to explain evolution to the children. The teacher asked a little boy:
Tommy do you see the tree outside?
TOMMY: Yes.
TEACHER: Tommy, do you see the grass Outside?
TOMMY: Yes.
TEACHER: Go outside and look up and see if you can see the sky.
TOMMY: Okay. (He returned a few minutes later) Yes, I saw the sky.
TEACHER: Did you see God up there?
TOMMY: No..
TEACHER: That's my point. We can't see God because he isn't there. Possibly he just doesn't exist.?
A little girl spoke up and wanted to ask the boy some questions.
The teacher agreed and the little girl asked the boy:
Tommy, do you see the tree outside?
TOMMY: Yes.
LITTLE GIRL: Tommy do you see the grass outside?
TOMMY: Yessssss!
LITTLE GIRL: Did you see the sky?
TOMMY: Yessssss!
LITTLE GIRL: Tommy, do you see the teacher?
TOMMY: Yes
LITTLE GIRL: Do you see her brain?
TOMMY: No
LITTLE GIRL: Then according to what we were taught today in school, she possibly may not even have one.
|
|
|
1
comment
|
|
|
Can someone who never heard the gospel be saved?
|
Aug 2, 2009 7:08 am
566 Views
|
Dancing With Eleanor
by Stanley McMahon (article from plain truth ministries)
Eleanor was profoundly disabled, both physically and mentally. She was unable to walk, talk, feed herself or look after her personal hygiene. She lived on a cot in the corner of a living room, with my aunt constantly caring for her needs.
It was twenty-four-seven caring in an age before caring became a recognized entity in its own right. Today, Eleanor would have probably been institutionalized, with daily specialist
treatments and stimulation. My cousin Eleanor didnt have any of that, but she had one thing influence. Although her communication was limited to groans and squeals, when she looked at you, you felt she was trying to say something. Or at least thats the way it felt to me. The thing that disturbed me most was the way she was left out. I wanted to talk to her, but her shaking and groaning frightened me, and so I was constrained to leave her out, too.
I wanted to tell others about my cousin Eleanor who was essentially trapped inside this collapsing and disabled tent of a body, but I was afraid they wouldnt understand. She was spoken about by my exhausted aunt, but rarely spoken to. Somewhere in the recesses of my childish heart, I longed for her to be respected more because she was my elder cousin, and she had the right to be heard and listened to.
But there she lived, on the cot, in the corner, until she died at the tender age of thirteen. That was when my simple and budding, but extremely limited, theology was first challenged. My understanding was that if a person died without having accepted Christ as their Savior, they would not be spending eternity with the Father.
I struggled with that and hoped God would understand but the rule of thumb was black and white. Was she saved or was she not? I still struggle with thoughts that are too wonderful for me to attain (Psalm 139:6). I still hold to the basic tenets of the Christian faith. I still believe that Christ is the only
way to salvation, that we are saved by grace alone, through faith alone.
But there is more gray on my palate as I paint my theology.
I have made room for the Eleanors of this world, for the exceptions of life and the stuff I cant understand. The wisest man of all time wrote a book called Ecclesiastes, about his observations of life. In one section he wrote that God has put eternity in the heart of man that he might not understand the beginning from the end (Ecclesiastes 3:11).
Eternity is the stuff that makes us want to be remembered beyond
our natural days and assures us that death is not the end; its the
thing that explains Augustines God-shaped void in the heart of
man. But God has indeed done more than put eternity in our
hearts. He has opened our vistas to unfathomable mysteries which he invites us to grapple with so that our faith in him might grow and so that our worship might deepen.
One day I will be in heaven with my Father, and my cousin Eleanor
will be there, too. She will be the one who is singing at the top of her voice a beautiful song of praise, and running and dancing in her perfect resurrection body. How great is our God and how worthy of our praise!
|
|
|
9
Comments
|
|
|
Organic Foods ... Do They Make a Difference?
|
Jul 31, 2009 4:03 pm
481 Views
|
Organic food is no healthier, study finds
Wed Jul 29, 2009
Reporting by Ben Hirschler; editing by Simon Jessop
LONDON (Reuters) - Organic food has no nutritional or health benefits over ordinary food, according to a major study published Wednesday.
Researchers from the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine said consumers were paying higher prices for organic food because of its perceived health benefits, creating a global organic market worth an estimated $48 billion in 2007.
A systematic review of 162 scientific papers published in the scientific literature over the last 50 years, however, found there was no significant difference.
"A small number of differences in nutrient content were found to exist between organically and conventionally produced foodstuffs, but these are unlikely to be of any public health relevance," said Alan Dangour, one of the report's authors.
"Our review indicates that there is currently no evidence to support the selection of organically over conventionally produced foods on the basis of nutritional superiority."
The results of research, which was commissioned by the British government's Food Standards Agency, were published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.
Sales of organic food have fallen in some markets, including Britain, as recession has led consumers to cut back on purchases.
The Soil Association said in April that growth in sales of organic products in Britain slowed to just 1.7 percent in 2008, well below the average annual growth rate of 26 percent over the last decade, following a plunge in demand at the end of the year.
|
|
|
6
Comments
|
|
|
China's Piece in the Prophetic Puzzle
|
Jul 25, 2009 9:03 am
341 Views
|
China Ecnomy Hums Along as U.S. Remains Mired in Recession
Fox News, Saturday, July 25, 2009
China recently announced its Gross Domestic Product grew by more than 7.1 percent in the first half of this year while the United States, the world's largest economy, remains mired in recession as do most of its fellow top industrial powers.
It's a tale of two economies, China and the United States.
The United States, the world's largest economy, remains mired in recession as do most of its fellow top industrial powers.
China, poised to pass Japan as the world's second-largest economy perhaps by late this year, recently announced its Gross Domestic Product grew by more than 7.1 percent in the first half of this year.
That puts it alone among the top 10 world powers whose economy has expanded in recent months, making it the first major country to emerge from the worst global slump since the 1930s. Many analysts suggest that China could help to lead the rest of the world out of the doldrums.
For China's part, it hopes the U.S. and other Western countries will also recover and revive their now-depressed demand for Chinese goods, further buoying the Chinese economy. U.S. officials, however, suggest that, with recession-shocked American consumers spending less and saving more, those glory days for Chinese exporters will not return anytime soon.
Economic and strategic cooperation among the two world economic superpowers tops the agenda as top officials from both countries hold a two-day meeting in Washington, beginning Monday.
"China is increasingly becoming a responsible citizen in the global community," said economist Allen Sinai of Decision Economics. "No longer lawless, no longer difficult to deal with, much more responsible. It is now a powerhouse among economies and finance. And it's a rich country."
China stands out as a case study in how government economic-stimulus can work.
In the United States, there are fierce debates over whether President Barack Obama's $787 billion stimulus, passed by Congress in February, is having much impact. Designed to help create jobs, U.S. unemployment continues to rise at a steep pace and the economy is still shrinking.
By contrast, Beijing's $586 billion stimulus effort, put in place last November, has been hugely successful by nearly all accounts.
It freed up massive public-works spending and made bank loans more available, spurring a huge increase in Chinese construction and purchases of cars, homes and other goods.
If anything, some economists suggest the Chinese stimulus may actually be working too well, threatening to overheat the Chinese economy. That raises concerns that the flood of easy money will cause inflation and set the stage for the same kind of housing-credit "bubble" that triggered the U.S. financial meltdown.
Why did China's stimulus work when the U.S. version was slow to kick in?
For one thing, China had many of the programs, including public works projects, in the planning stages for two or three years so they got a head start once hit last year by the global downturn. China also didn't have to go through the tortuous gyrations that the Federal Reserve and Treasury did to inject money into U.S. banks in hopes of getting them to resume lending.
"Credit was flowing not because Chinese bankers were inherently confident about their economy. Credit was flowing because the Communist Party was telling the banks to lend," said Charles Freeman, former assistant U.S. trade representative for China affairs and now with the Center for Strategic and International Studies.
While exports may not be as much a driver of the Chinese economy as in the past, China is well situated to benefit in any upturn, particularly because of its reputation for manufacturing inexpensive products, said Freeman. "Cheap goods are relatively in demand in times of economic trouble, and so China is the first and last resort for cheap goods," he said.
In addition to better economic cooperation, Beijing is also Washington's most important partner in efforts to discourage or contain North Korea's nuclear ambitions.
Still, the U.S.- Chinese relationship isn't all rosy.
There remain security concerns as it bulks up as a military superpower as well as an economic one.
And there is still much trade friction between the two countries. Many in Congress and in organized labor still view China warily as a fierce competitor for U.S. manufacturing jobs.
"New opportunities in President Obama's new green economy will go to big players like GM and to businesses in China, where the government understands global commerce is played by rules of prison football," said Peter Morici, a business economist at the University of Maryland and former chief economist at the U.S. International Trade Commission.
"China has more than 100 million rural underemployed workers who, if moved into factories, could replace every manufacturing job in the United States, Western Europe and Japan," Morici said.
China and the United States are each other's second-largest trading partner. But the trade is way out of whack. The U.S. trade deficit with China remains its largest, even though trade overall has been down because of the global recession.
The Economic Policy Institute, a union-funded think tank, says that China represents a staggering 83 percent of the entire U.S. trade deficit in non-oil goods, up from 26 percent in 2000.
There is also a long-simmering dispute between the U.S. and China over exchange rates. U.S. officials claim China's currency policies end up overpricing U.S. goods there and making Chinese-made goods less expensive in the U.S.
And, as the largest holder of U.S. debt -- mostly in the form of Treasury bonds -- Beijing holds vast economic leverage over the United States. Suddenly selling those Treasurys or significantly reducing its debt holdings could send shock waves through the global financial system and make it harder for the U.S. to finance its mushrooming debt.
Most economists believe China is unlikely to make any such moves, because it would reduce the value of its own vast holdings in Treasurys. But Beijing might slow down its purchases of Treasurys and other dollar-denominated investments, complicating efforts for the United States to finance a budget deficit expected to surpass $1.8 trillion this year and a cumulative national debt approaching $12 trillion.
Also, there's one area in which China has now surpassed the U.S. and remains the world leader, even if it's hardly an honor. It is now the world's largest carbon emitter.
U.S. policymakers recognize that costly steps taken by Western nations to reduce pollution to help control global warming will mean little if China, with its population of 1.3 billion people, does not join in the effort.
But so far, the U.S. has been unable to persuade China to work to lower its emissions. China argues with conviction that it has a right to develop rapidly in hopes of attaining Western living standards and that its per capita pollution remains a fraction of that in the U.S. It also claims to have made great recent strides in energy efficiency and cleaning up coal plants.
|
|
|
1
comment
|
|
|
Sotomayor: The payback judge
|
Jul 11, 2009 9:09 am
413 Views
|
Sotomayor: The payback judge
By Thomas Sowell
Back when I was on the receiving end of racial discrimination, it was to me not simply a personal misfortune, or even the misfortune of a race; it was a moral outrage. But not everyone who went through such an experience sees it that way.
When it comes to subjecting other people to the same treatment in a later era, some have no real problem with that. They see it as payback.
One of the many problems of the payback approach is that many of the people who most deserve retribution are no longer alive. You can take symbolic revenge on people who look like them, but this removes the whole moral element. If it is all right to discriminate today against individuals who have done you no harm, then why was it wrong to discriminate against you in the past?
These are not just abstract questions. These are serious, real world questions, especially when considering someone to be given a lifetime appointment to the Supreme Court of the United States.
Some judicial nominees have had racial bias attributed to them, despite their years of unwavering support of civil rights for all Judge Robert Bork and Judge Charles Pickering being striking examples. But the current Supreme Court nominee is the first in decades to explicitly introduce racial differences in their own words, along with the claim that their own racial or ethnic background makes them better qualified.
Attempts to claim that Judge Sonia Sotomayor's words were isolated remarks a slip of the tongue "taken out of context" have now been discredited by further information showing that she has repeatedly expressed the same ideas, in virtually the same words, at other times and in other contexts.
Understand how judge-made law has transformed America in contradiction to the Constitution: Read "Betrayed by the Bench" by John Stormer
Moreover, her deeds including years of participation in group identity politics are perfectly consistent with her words. So too was her vote on the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals to summarily dismiss the appeal of white firefighters who did not get the promotions they had earned by passing a required test, because not enough minority firefighters passed to provide racial "diversity."
The Supreme Court of the United States found that appeal worth hearing, even if Judge Sotomayor did not.
The warm and genial image of Sonia Sotomayor presented on television, during President Obama's introduction and afterwards, is in sharp contrast with what attorneys who have appeared before her in court have said.
A poll of such attorneys showed them rating her worse than other judges in her treatment of those who appeared before her. A tape of Judge Sotomayor's abusive behavior in court backed up the attorneys' picture. It is also consistent with someone in payback mode.
A confirmation decision on a Supreme Court nominee is not like deciding whether someone is innocent or guilty of a crime. It is right in criminal cases that the burden of proof is on those making an accusation, and that the accusation be proved "beyond a reasonable doubt."
Judge Sotomayor is not in jeopardy of either criminal or civil penalties. So there is no reason why either the criminal standard or proof "beyond a reasonable doubt" or the civil standard of "the preponderance of evidence" is required for determining whether she is the right person to be given a lifetime appointment to the highest court of the land.
It is hundreds of millions of Americans current and future whose fundamental rights are at stake whenever any nominee is being considered for the Supreme Court of the United States. It is the American people as a whole who are entitled to the benefit of the doubt.
One of those fundamental rights was taken away just four years ago, when a 5 to 4 decision by the Supreme Court gave local politicians the right to seize your home or business and turn the property over to some other private party that they favor. Just one vote on the Supreme Court can make a huge difference.
We have been told endlessly about Sonia Sotomayor's biography and her symbolism as a Hispanic woman. Is that enough to risk millions of other Americans' fundamental rights?
|
|
|
3
Comments
|
|
To link to this blog (Tom45) use [blog Tom45] in your messages.
|
|
|
| Sun |
Mon |
Tue |
Wed |
Thu |
Fri |
Sat |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
61
|
71
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
211
|
22
|
231
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
