Advertisement
Bringing people together in love and faith
My Blog
Blogs > Sweethoney2007 > Intimacy in the Spirit
Intimacy in the Spirit
  
You must be born again to enter into the kingdom of God.
Title View |
Bible Prophecy Predicts Globalization Sep 16, 2008 11:25 am
140 Views
The process of globalisation formally began in 1975 when, from 15th to 17th November, the leaders of France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America met in the first annual economic summit of the world's greatest nations.

This first meeting, the Sommet d'Rambouillet, was arranged by the French President, Val鲹 Giscard d'Estaing, and held in the Chⴥau de Rambouillet near Paris, France. "On the agenda were international monetary disorder and the oil crisis."[1]

The G7 group of elite nations was officially founded in 1976, when Canada joined the globalisation club at its second meeting, held in Puerto Rico on 27 and 28 June 1976. Since then, G7 has met each year to discuss the progress of globalisation and decide the next stages of the New World Order. "Each summit is unique and takes the G7 one step further in its evolution. The 1995 summit in Halifax, Canada, led to significant changes in the way in which the World Bank, the IMF and other international organisations operated."

The G7 economic alliance was extended to eight member states when Russia joined in 1998, although the Russians will not host the summit until 2006. According to the official website, the G7 agenda "has now turned to a more structural and global perspective and has added a wide range of political and social issues to its workload".

Students of ancient prophecy should be aware of certain parallels between the establishment of G7 and the signs and events expected to precede the Apocalypse according to Christian scripture. The parable or riddle of the "seven kings" in The Revelation to St John "calls for a mind that has wisdom", and can be interpreted as seven great nations leading the world for a period prior to Judgement day.

The End-Times prophecy in the Bible specifically predicts the reign of the being who the Christians call God being established by twenty-four leaders of the people of Earth. The first globalisation summit was attended by exactly twenty-four delegates - four from each of the six most affluent nations. The numbers may be highly significant, because the relevant text comprises verses 15 to 17 of the eleventh chapter in the Book of Revelation, and either by coincidence or by design G7 was founded between the 15th and the 17th days of the eleventh month.

"Then the seventh angel blew his trumpet, and there were
loud voices in heaven, saying, 'The kingdom of the world
has become the kingdom of our Lord and of his Messiah,
and he will reign forever and ever.' Then the twenty-four
elders who sit on their thrones before God fell on their
faces and worshiped God, singing, 'We give you thanks,
Lord God Almighty, who are and who were, for you
have taken your great power and begun to reign.'

The G7 elite met in Paris last weekend to address the worsening crisis of global recession.[5] Senior financial ministers and politicians from the world's seven most powerful economies warned the US President that his tax cuts of $695 billion, which are designed to benefit the richest 1% of Americans, will "destabilise a world economy already undermined by threat of war in Iraq".[6]

This prophetic parallel was first recognised by Mr T. V. Acheson in 1999, and this article is the first time that it has ever been documented in the public domain. In the words of Mr Acheson (1999), "You may not believe in gods or prophecy, but among the leaders of nations there are those who do."

The insider News
0 Comments
Toward a Global Police State..strategy to make the UN the most powerful force on earth Sep 15, 2008 1:09 pm
200 Views
THIS ARTICLE WAS WRITTEN BY A PRO REPUBLICAN WHO KNOWS AND FEELS THREATENED BY UN GLOBALIZATION AND NATIONAL SOVERIGNTY, so what does that tell you????

Toward a global police state: under both republican and democratic administrations, the U.S. government has been implementing a decades-old strategy to make the UN the most powerful force on earth

More than 40 years ago, America's leaders announced their intention to subject USA to formal UN control. Two documents issued during the Kennedy administration outlined nearly identical plans. Though the young president nominally headed the U.S. government, matters such as disarmament and U.S. relationship with the UN were handled by men he had put in place at the State and Defense departments. At the time, Dean Rusk and Robert S. McNamara, veteran members of the council on Foreign Relations, led these fundamentally important divisions of government. America was being led then, and has continued to be led ever since then, by like-minded individuals working to achieve the CFR's world-government goal.

Less than a year after taking office, Mr. Kennedy journeyed to UN headquarters in New York city on September 25, 1961 to unveil an official U.S. policy entitled Freedom From War: The United States Program For General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World, also known as Department of State Publication 7277. In a major speech, he asked the assembled representatives of the world's governments to commit "not to an arms race, but to a peace race -- to advance together step by step, stage by stage, until general and complete disarmament has been achieved."

It is important to understand, however, that "disarmament" under the UN does not mean eliminating all weapons but giving the UN a monopoly of power.

The three stages contained in Freedom From War call for a variety of arms control agreements (many of which have already been created) and a steady buildup of UN military capabilities to create a "U.N. Peace Force." Stage III proclaims that "progressive controlled disarmament ... would proceed to a point where no state would have the power to challenge the progressively strengthened U.N. Peace Force." Consequently, nationhood would become meaningless and the UN would rule mankind.

Walt Rostow (CFR) was one of the Kennedy administration's planners who produced Freedom From War. Employed as a deputy special assistant for national security affairs when the Kennedy administration took office, his book The United States in the World Arena had just appeared. Among hundreds of pages of his clearly subversive views, he wrote:

It is a legitimate American national objective to see removed from all nations -- including the United States -- the right to use substantial military force to pursue their own objectives. Since this residual right is the root of national sovereignty ... it is, therefore, an American interest to see an end to nationhood as it has been historically defined.

The disarmament envisioned by those who produced Freedom From War is directed not only at every nation's military forces but at any force standing in the way of total UN control. The only weapons permitted outside of those possessed by the UN's Peace Force would be those "required for the purpose of maintaining internal order." In addition, the document states that "the manufacture of armaments would be prohibited except for those of agreed types and quantities to be used by the U.N. ... to maintain internal order."

What about privately owned weapons? The document does not mention small arms explicitly, but it does make clear: "All other armaments would be destroyed or converted to peaceful purposes." There should be no doubt as to the intent of the internationalists to eventually eliminate private firearms. The statue of the handgun with the twisted barrel in front of UN headquarters offers a powerful clue (see the photo on page 25). That anti-gun image is consistent with Un Secretary-General Kofi Annan's official 2000 report entitled We the Peoples. He stated: "Controlling the proliferation of illicit [e.g., civilian-owned] weapons is a necessary first step towards the non-proliferation of small arms.... These weapons must be brought under the control of states, and states must be held responsible for their transfer."

A year after Kennedy completed his scripted performance before the UN, Senator Joseph Clark (D-Penn.) assured his colleagues on September 1, 1962 that Freedom From War was "the fixed, determined and approved policy of the government of the United States." The document was superseded in 1962 by Blueprint for the Peace Race: Outline of Provisions of a Treaty on General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World. But the Blueprint candidly admits that it "elaborates and extends the proposals of September 25," the date of Kennedy's UN speech.
Fifty-eight pages in length, A World Effectively Controlled by the United Nations wastes no time establishing its subversive goal. Terms such as "universal membership [in the UN]," "monopoly of force [possessed by the UN]," and "[a UN] world government" appear when the author defined his terms. Bloomfield's plan concluded: "The essential point is the transfer of the most vital element of sovereign power from the states to the supranational government ... the loss of control of their military power." This is essentially the goal sought in Freedom From War.

How would the future "world government" deal with isolated uprisings, unruly citizenry, or guerrilla warfare? In one of two answers to this question, Bloomfield offered: "No international system except a total tyranny complete with the apparatus of a police state would be capable of dealing with certainty with this type of disorder."

Bloomfield suggested reliance on "a total tyranny complete with the apparatus of a police state" only if "international peace and security were jeopardized." And this total tyranny should be employed only "in appropriate circumstances." To summarize: No one but UN-authorized police or military would be permitted to threaten the world.Once a nation loses control of its military, its ability to function independently disappears. Whoever possesses the force of arms that previously guaranteed independence will have become the dictator of future conduct. If resistance develops, military force or military-directed police will be employed, as Freedom From War indicated, "to maintain internal order."

The result will be "peace," but it will be the peace of submission more commonly known as the peace of the grave. That this is what U.S. leaders are bringing about cannot be denied.


John F. McManus
4 Comments
United Nations To Vastly Expand Global Police Force Sep 15, 2008 12:57 pm
178 Views
With the world facing new security threats, the U.N. is planning for an unprecedented expansion of its police missions. U.N. officials say a shift in the nature of conflicts requires revamped peacekeeping operations.

Traditionally, the U.N. has facilitated peace between warring states by sending its blue-helmeted soldiers to man buffer zones between their armies. But today, interventions are increasingly focused on settling civil wars.

“In recent years the character of conflicts has changed dramatically from mainly state-to-state wars (to) intrastate conflicts which pit various factions within the boundaries of a single state,” U.N. Police Chief Andrew Hughes said.

As a result, there is a greater need than ever for conventional police duties in post-conflict situations.

Nowhere is this highlighted more clearly than in Darfur.

The U.N. is recruiting nearly 7,000 police officers to assist some 20,000 U.N. peacekeeper-soldiers in trying to end the four-year conflict in western Sudan.

Police involvement in peacekeeping dates from the inaugural 1948 mission, when first Secretary-General Trygve Lie urgently dispatched several dozen U.N. security guards from New York to Jerusalem when Jewish extremists assassinated the U.N. peace envoy Folke Bernadotte.

In later interventions, however, the U.N. has come to rely mostly on soldiers to monitor cease-fires or interpose themselves between warring sides, as happened in the Sinai after the 1956 Egypt-Israel war, or later in disputed Kashmir, Cyprus and Lebanon.

The Balkan wars of the 1990s put renewed focus on peacekeeping by police units.

“In such conflicts, once peace is restored the U.N. then has a key role in re-establishing rule of law, which includes police, courts, prisons and the whole justice sector, and to ensure that they rebuild or build up from scratch their police services,” Hughes said.

But Hughes emphasized that police and military missions have critical differences.

Soldiers have different rules of engagement that provide for the use of lethal force and are therefore not suited for such duties such as apprehending criminals, escorting children to schools or calming rioting mobs.

“For us the use of force is absolutely the last option,” Hughes said. “Our police are trained much more extensively to defuse the situation, and negotiations are by far and away the biggest tool we have.”

A new Police Division was set up in October 2000 as part of the U.N. Department of Peacekeeping Operations with a staff of several dozen experienced police officers from contributing countries.

Currently, there are about 70,000 U.N. peacekeeping troops deployed worldwide, with an additional 9,500 police officers, mostly in Africa — such as Liberia, Ivory Coast, Congo, Burundi and Western Sahara — as well as in Haiti, Kosovo and East Timor.

With U.N. missions in Chad and Darfur coming on line in 2008, the ranks of U.N. police are to swell to nearly 17,000 officers from more than 100 countries.

“Our duties included everything a policeman can possibly do, from breaking up domestic disturbances to chasing and arresting armed criminals,” said Irhad Campara, a Bosnian policeman who served in the U.N. mission in East Timor.

“In addition, we recruited, vetted and trained from scratch East Timor’s new national police force.”

Whereas military units are dispatched by governments, police officers are recruited on individual contracts from contributing nations. They continue to collect their home pay but receive an extra daily allowance of $150 and accommodation from the U.N.

Not all operations have gone smoothly, however, and the U.N. police force has suffered several high-profile reverses over the past several years.

In 2004, U.N. police officers failed to stem the violence in Kosovo when thousands of ethnic Albanians rioted in a backlash against the Serb minority, killing 19 people, displacing thousands, and destroying hundreds of Serb homes, churches and monasteries.

And in East Timor, the U.N.-trained police force collapsed last year following an army mutiny, necessitating another mission to rebuild it anew.

To hopefully prevent such calamities, the U.N. is preparing two initiatives to facilitate rapid police deployment to crisis areas and to enable them to function more effectively from the outset.

The first is the introduction of Formed Police Units — 160-strong contingents of officers from a single country — skilled in dealing with a wide spectrum of problems, from riot control to arresting armed criminals.

The initial unit, an all-female company of Indian officers, has recently arrived in Liberia to join the U.N. force there.

The second initiative is to create a standing police detachment of about two dozen officers who can be deployed together with U.N. military units to a trouble spot, thus allowing the police to be present from the start of a U.N. mission.

Previously, the slow and complicated process of recruiting volunteers from participating countries meant police recruits lagged an average of nine months behind the soldiers.

But critics say these measures are insufficient.

William Durch from the Henry L. Stimson Center, a think tank in Washington, proposed creating a ready reserve of about 11,000 police volunteers worldwide who would be paid retainer fees while on standby and who could be quickly mobilized for future U.N. missions.

“The system by which the U.N. recruits its people must be completely revamped to be able to provide security personnel in the critical initial phases of a mission,” said Durch, an expert on peacekeeping operations.
SLOBODAN LEKIC
1 comment
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE (ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT ON ITS WAY) Sep 15, 2008 12:40 pm
173 Views
(NOTICE HOW COUNTRIES ARE NOW CALLED STATES)

The International Court of Justice (ICJ) is the principal judicial organ of the United Nations (UN). It was established in June 1945 by the Charter of the United Nations and began work in April 1946.

The seat of the Court is at the Peace Palace in The Hague (Netherlands). Of the six principal organs of the United Nations, it is the only one not located in New York (United States of America).

The Court’s role is to settle, in accordance with international law, legal disputes submitted to it by States and to give advisory opinions on legal questions referred to it by authorized United Nations organs and specialized agencies.

The Court is composed of 15 judges, who are elected for terms of office of nine years by the United Nations General Assembly and the Security Council. It is assisted by a Registry, its administrative organ. Its official languages are English and French.

The International Court of Justice acts as a world court. The Court has a dual jurisdiction : it decides, in accordance with international law, disputes of a legal nature that are submitted to it by States (jurisdiction in contentious cases); and it gives advisory opinions on legal questions at the request of the organs of the United Nations or specialized agencies authorized to make such a request (advisory jurisdiction).

The Court has a twofold role: to settle, in accordance with international law, legal disputes submitted to it by States (Contentious cases ) and to give advisory opinions (Advisory proceedings) on legal questions referred to it by duly authorized United Nations organs and specialized agencies.

In Contentious proceedings, when a dispute is brought before the Court by a unilateral application filed by one State against another State, the names of parties in the official title of the case are separated by the abbreviation v. for the Latin versus (e.g., Cameroonv. Nigeria). When a dispute is submitted to the Court on the basis of a special agreement between two States, the names of the parties are separated by an oblique stroke (e.g., Indonesia/Malaysia).

The first case entered in the General List of the Court (Corfu Channel (United Kingdom v. Albania)) was submitted on 22 May 1947.

From 22 May 1947 to 15 September 2008, 140 cases were entered in the General List.
1 comment
International Human Rights Law (Moving Towards a One World Government) Sep 15, 2008 12:28 pm
198 Views
The international human rights movement was strengthened when the United Nations General Assembly adopted of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) on 10 December 1948. Drafted as ‘a common standard of achievement for all peoples and nations', the Declaration for the first time in human history spell out basic civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights that all human beings should enjoy. It has over time been widely accepted as the fundamental norms of human rights that everyone should respect and protect. The UDHR, together with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and its two Optional Protocols, and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, form the so - called International Bill of Human Rights.

A series of international human rights treaties and other instruments adopted since 1945 have conferred legal form on inherent human rights and developed the body of international human rights. Other instruments have been adopted at the regional level reflecting the particular human rights concerns of the region and providing for specific mechanisms of protection. Most States have also adopted constitutions and other laws which formally protect basic human rights. While international treaties and customary law form the backbone of international human rights law other instruments, such as declarations, guidelines and principles adopted at the international level contribute to its understanding, implementation and development. Respect for human rights requires the establishment of the rule of law at the national and international levels.

International human rights law lays down obligations which States are bound to respect. By becoming parties to international treaties, States assume obligations and duties under international law to respect, to protect and to fulfil human rights. The obligation to respect means that States must refrain from interfering with or curtailing the enjoyment of human rights. The obligation to protect requires States to protect individuals and groups against human rights abuses. The obligation to fulfil means that States must take positive action to facilitate the enjoyment of basic human rights.

Through ratification of international human rights treaties, Governments undertake to put into place domestic measures and legislation compatible with their treaty obligations and duties. Where domestic legal proceedings fail to address human rights abuses, mechanisms and procedures for individual complaints or communications are available at the regional and international levels to help ensure that international human rights standards are indeed respected, implemented, and enforced at the local level.

UNITED NATIONS
2 Comments
Religious ( So Called Christians included) Groups that support URI Sep 15, 2008 12:50 am
224 Views
This was taken from URI web. Check it out for your self. Many more.

The Interfaith Alliance


The Interfaith Center at the Presidio (SF, CA)


Interfaith Center of New York


InterFaith Conference of Metropolitan Washington (DC)

Jewish-Christian Relations

Multifaith AIDS project, Seattle WA


World Congress of Faiths


The Guthrie Center (Housatonic, MA)


American Interfaith Institute


North American Interfaith Network


MADIA (Masyarakat Dialog Antar Agama)/SIDA (Society for Inter-Religious Dialogue)

Zen Guide

Shaolin Gung Fu Institute


Order of Buddhist Contemplatives


International Research Institute for Zen Buddhism (IRIZ)

Islam Links

Islam USA

Islamic Finder

Islam Information Page


Discover Islam


Catholic Information Center on Internet

The Order of Preachers

Jesuit Conference (US)

The Vatican

Anabaptist and Baptist Christianity

Mennonite Church USA

Anabaptist Mennonites

The Anabaptist Church

Seventh Day Baptist

Alliance of Baptists

American Baptist Churches

General Buddhism

Fundamental Buddhism .

Center for Buddhist Studies

Tricycle: The Buddhist Review

Buddhist Peace Fellowship

All About Sikhs


The Sikhism

Global Forum

World Peace Prayer Society

International Association for Religious Freedom

Interfaith Voices for Peace and Justice


Fellowship of Reconciliation
.

The Mahatma Gandhi Canadian Foundation for World Peace

Baptist Peace Fellowship

Buddhist Peace Fellowship

Catholic Peace Fellowship

Church of God Peace Fellowship

Disciples Peace Fellowship

Episcopal Peace Fellowship

Jewish Peace Fellowship

Lutheran Peace Fellowship

Orthodox Peace Fellowship

Presbyterian Peace Fellowship

Unitarian Universalist Peace Fellowship

Worldwide Faith News

Religion News Service

National Religious Partnership for the Environment

Radio For Peace International

Interfaith Works

Ecumenical News International

The Center for Respect of Life and Environment

Zoroastrianism

World of Traditional Zoroastrianism

Confucianism

Siutao

Center of Traditional Taoist Studies


Images of Taoism from Lao Tzu's Tao Te Ching


Sufism Journal
What is Sufism?

International Association of Sufism

Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of North and South America

Russian Orthodox Church

Orthodox Christian Information Center

Official United Methodist Church
Information on the United Methodists and links to UM churches.

Methodist Church of Great Britain

Church of the Lutheran Brethren of America

Lutheran World Federation

Evangelical Lutheran Church in America

Missouri Synod Lutherans

Rabbinical Council of America (RCA)

Central coordinating agency for American and Canadian Orthodox Jewish congregations.

Kabbalah

Bluethread

Shamash, The Jewish Internet Consortium

Essence of Jainism

Jain Study Circle

A Quaker organization which includes people of various faiths who are committed to social justice, peace, and humanitarian service.

Religions for Peace: World Conference of Religions for Peace

International Network for Interfaith Health Practices (IHP-NET)

Computerized AIDS Ministries

The International Interfaith Centre, Oxford

International Fellowship of Christians and Jews

Council for a Parliament of the World's Religions

Hartley Film Foundation

The International Sacred Art Museum Online

Goddess 2000

AAAS Dialogue on Science, Ethics, & Religion

The Center for Theology & the Natural Sciences

European Society for the Study of Science and Theology

Wittenberg Center for Alternative Resources

Global Dialogue Institute

Islam and Dialog Student Association

Scarboro Catholic Missions

International Shinto Foundation

The Hopi Way

Huna from Hawaii

Rastafarianism

Ifa Foundation of North America

National Council of Churches of Christ (USA)

World Council of Churches

Worldwide Faith News

Institute for Christian Leadership

Apostolic Faith Ministry

National Assembly of Evangelicals

United Pentecostal Church International

Seventh Day Adventist Official for the Seventh Day Adventist Church

The EarthSpirit Community

COGWEB Covenant of the Goddess, (Wiccas)

Pagan Federation

Wiccan Church of Canada

Circle Sanctuary

United Church of Christ

Unitarian Universalist Association

Unitarian Universalist Christian Fellowship

The Unitarian Universalist Women's Heritage Society

Presbyterian Church (US)

The Orthodox Presbyterian Church

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints

Hinduism Today

Global Hindu

Hare Krishna

Yoga Vasistha

The Order of Bards Ovates & Druids
Basic information on the Order.

Nemeton Celtic Reconstructionism.

The Sanctum of Cathbad

Clannada na Gadelica

Henge of Keltria

Ar n'Draiocht Fein

Episcopal Church

Worldwide Anglican Communion

Church of England

African Methodist Episcopal Church

Ring of Troth

Raven Kindred

Asatru Folk Assembly

Irminsul Aettir's Asatru pages

Dhargyey Buddhist Centres (New Zealand)

Quiet Mountain Tibetan Buddhist Resource Guide

Dharma Realm Buddhist Association

Vipassana Research Institute

Samatha Trust's Buddhist Meditation
15 Comments
The Current Ecumenical Movement is a precursor to the Global Religion of Antichrist Sep 15, 2008 12:14 am
184 Views
The current Ecumenical Movement was a precursor to the global religion of Antichrist, which, according to Scriptural Prophecy, is to be initially headed the False Prophet.

Biblical Prophecy The False Prophet Foretold and Described

Revelation 13:11 "And I beheld another beast coming up out of the earth; and he had two horns like a lamb, and he spake as a dragon. And he exerciseth all the power of the first beast before him, and causeth the earth and them which dwell therein to worship the first beast..."

The 'Second Beast', following the First Beast in Revelation 13:1-10 [Antichrist] will lead the peoples of the entire world into a worship of Antichrist. Bible scholars have historically called this 'Second Beast', the False Prophet

This 'Second Beast' will be a Christian leader, a counterfeit Christian leader; look carefully at the description given him, "he had two horns like a lamb". Of course, Jesus Christ is consistently referred to as the "Lamb of God" or the "Lamb which taketh away the sins of the world". [John 1:29, 36] Therefore, a lamb has come to symbolize the True Savior of the World, Jesus Christ. So, this passage holds forth for us a counterfeit lamb, a leader who claims to be "Christian" and who is accepted as such by the vast majority of the peoples of the world

This Prophet is counterfeit and Satanic by the next phrase in Rev 13:11, "and he spake as a dragon". In Scripture, Satan is referred to as a "dragon" [Revelation 12:9], so we know that this False Prophet will be empowered by Satan, just as Antichrist is empowered by Satan. Later, in Rev 16:13-14, we see a picture of both Antichrist and the false

Prophet being indwelt by demonic entities which appear to the Apostle John as green orbs [this is a common type of demonic possession, by the way, afflicting many in the New Age religion]. "And I saw three unclean spirits like frogs come out of the mouth of the dragon, and out of the mouth of the beast, and out of the mouth of the false prophet. For they are the spirits of devils, working miracles, which go forth unto the kings of the earth and of the whole world, to gather them to the battle of that great day of God Almighty."

Biblical Prophecy foretells the existence of a False Religious Prophet that leads the world into worship of Antichrist, and this false religious leader will claim to be Christian.

The Roman Pope has been selected to be the top global religious leader of the New World Order Religion to be leaxder of this movement, lining up biblical Prophecy that makes the man of Rome the Biblical False Prophet!

But, what about the prophecy, in Rev 13:11-12, that he will be the same type of spiritually-empowered individual as the Antichrist? Fortunately, I had the opportunity to get this question answered, as well. When Mr. Lambert began his seminar, he stated that anyone could interrupt him at any time with a question, simply by raising his hand. Shortly after stating that the Pope would be the leader of the New World Order Religion,

Lambert said that the Antichrist can only arise after a significant people could accept him. Lambert likened this acceptance as "being a proper receptor" for the Christ [Antichrist]. Quoting Lambert "Energies want to flow from the Hierarchy to earth to produce the physical manifestation of the Christ; but, such flow can only occur when humanity raises its collective consciousness to be properly awakened receptors." (Page 617-618, Externalisation of the Hierarchy, paraphrased by Mr. Lambert).

The Roman Church has led the global Ecumenical Movement almost from the beginning, and is very successful in bridging the gaps existing between all the religions of the world, including liberal or apostate Christian groups that ally themselves with The New Jerusalem Covenant Project, to the creation of the infant 'United Religions'.

Episcopal Bishop Swing stated that the United Religions Initiative would produce "peace" in the world. Any Christian who knows their prophecy would immediately sit up and take notice, because the Apostle Paul stated that the coming kingdom of Antichrist would come amidst proclamations of "Peace and Safety"

There are thirteen religions around the world that are involved in this global Ecumenical effort that has finally produced the United Religions

1)Ancient Religions
2) BaHaiFaith
3) Buddha30
4) Christianity
5) EastReligion
6) Hinduism
7) Islam Religion
8 ) Judaism
9) Magic Religions
10) Pantheism
11) Sikh30
12) Tao30
13) Zoroaster Religion

The time is getting very, very short before the appearance of Antichrist, and the appointment of his religious counterpart, the False Prophet

THE CUTTING EDGE
5 Comments
What Is The United Religions Initiative? Adherents of "modern spiritual movements," Sep 14, 2008 11:47 pm
153 Views
Bishop William Swing, of the Episcopal Church's Diocese of California, thinks he is building a religious bridge to the new millennium, and he wants everybody on Earth to cross it with him. His United Religions Initiative URI is trying to create a United Religions, a world parliament of religions, "a permanent assembly, with the stature and visibility of the United Nations, where the world's religions and spiritual communities will gather on a daily basis, in prayerful dialogue and cooperative action, to make peace among religions and to be a force for peace among nations, to address urgent human need and to heal the earth." (41) As Bishop Swing has said, "the religions of the world should aspire to be as moral as the nations of the world and meet regularly to strive for global good." (42) The Rev. Charles Gibbs, Executive Director of the URI, describes the proposed United Religions (UR) as "an inclusive, decentralized organization, a spiritual partner of the United Nations." (43)

Its planners intend for the UR to be everywhere; it "will have global visibility and stature, and will be a vital presence in local communities all over the world." (44) Bishop Swing states the goal, "a reunited humanity": "a United Religions could offer the world a powerful new vision of hope - the vision that the deepest stories we know can now cease to be causes of separation between people, and become instead the foundation for a reunited humanity." (45)

The URI invites everybody to join: believers in the traditional religions, adherents of "modern spiritual movements," and those whom Bishop Swing describes as "earnest agnostics." (46) URI staff member Paul Andrews urges fundamentalists of all faiths to enter a new dialogue within the United Religions: "We need the power of what the fundamentalists bring as part of the religious conversation. It is my hope that our organization will not just be a network of religious liberals, but will include people who have real differences." (47) URI Executive Director Charles Gibbs said that "indigenous religions" would be included in the URI "the same way everyone else would be involved. ... I was just in Oxford and we were talking about indigenous religions. Well, the indigenous religion there is the Druid faith." (4

When Bishop Swing and other URI proponents speak to the public about the URI, their most common theme is one that has almost universal appeal: the desire for peace and the fear of war and terrorism. Bishop Swing says, "What is a bigger terrorist threat than religion in the world today? There is none." (49) On another occasion, he wrote, "Religions need a United Religions. Bombs are exploding in the name of God in cities throughout the world, religious persecution is more prevalent now than ever before, religious extremists are demanding and obtaining nuclear weapons, and still there is no neutral arena where all of the religions can engage each other." (50) Thus, Bishop Swing offers us a way out of fear into peace, a lure that many find hard to resist. To call forth our courage and imagination on behalf of the URI, Bishop Swing quotes from the prologue of Goethe's Faust: "Whatever you can do, or dream you can, begin it. Boldness has genius, power, and magic in it." (51)

Since the 1893 Parliament of the World's Religions, there has been a legion of interfaith groups attempting to unite the world's religions. However, the Rev. James Davis, an interfaith minister from New York, said of the URI conference he attended in 1997: "We've never seen any organization build coalitions as quickly or as successfully as the United Religions Initiative." (52) Commenting on the 1998 URI summit conference, Huston Smith, a scholar of comparative religions and author of The World's Religions, a standard reference in the field, deems the URI the "most significant" interfaith effort. (53)

The agenda of the URI and its allies is far broader - and far stranger - than ending violence in the name of religion. In mid-1996, Bishop Swing explained that "The nature of the United Religions would be to focus on: 1) the whole human family; 2) the whole health of our planet; and 3) the whole realm of living species, and to offer the unique gifts of religions." (54) He added that "the creation of a United Religions" would:

"set the world's hope ablaze to imagine a religious, global sensitivity to all life instead of despairing over the present fragmentation that exists among guardians of the world's soul." (55)

This was not the first time that Bishop Swing had invoked the anima mundi. In February 1996, Bishop Swing had said, "I think that as we become one global unit, we have to find out where religion is in regard to our global tribe." (56) In 1995, Bishop Swing had said that the world is moving toward "unity in terms of global economy, global media, global ecological system. What is missing is a global soul." (57)

How will this global soul be found or created? At first, by means of conferences, networking, fundraising, declarations, and press releases.

...

The draft URI Charter

Whether or not the rest of the world listens when the URI talks, the URI takes itself very seriously indeed. They have prepared a draft charter showing that the URI can help solve mankind's most deep-seated problems, if only the world will take heed.

The June 1998 draft of the URI Charter includes almost 20 pages of politically correct rhetoric about diversity, tolerance, peace, and justice. Nevertheless, the draft charter also contains real substance that shows the direction in which the URI wishes to take the world. Deepak Naik, a delegate to the 1998 summit conference, said that the charter's "words are carefully selected," with attention to "how we include people," (190) - so let's see what words they selected.

Preamble: "for the benefit of the earth and all living beings"

The Charter Preamble begins with a declaration of goodwill that encompasses all religions - and all living things on the Earth:

"We, people of many faiths, called by our traditions to compassion in response to the suffering of humanity and the crises which endanger our Earth community, wish to create a permanent forum where we gather in mutual respect, dialogue, and cooperative action to foster peace and the flourishing of all life." (191)

...

The Charter views all religions and spiritual traditions alike as sources of wisdom - again, to be used for the benefit of "the earth and all living beings":

"We believe that the wisdom of our religious and spiritual traditions should be shared for the health and well being of all. Therefore, as communities of faith and interdependent people rooted in our faith, we now unite for the sake of peace and healing among religions, peoples and nations, and for the benefit of the earth and all living beings." (192)

The Preamble commits the URI to freedom of religion and human rights (as defined by UN treaties), to "diversity," and to non-violence:

"We unite to support freedom of religion and belief and the rights of all individuals, as set forth in international law, and to witness together to the wondrous spirit of life which embraces all our diversity. ... All members of the United Religions do solemnly vow to use our combined resources only for nonviolent, compassionate action." (193)

Then, the URI promises to make public policy recommendations based on "shared values," and will "unite in responsible cooperative action" to bring about social change:

"We unite in responsible cooperative action to bring the wisdom and values of our religious traditions to bear on the economic, environmental and social crises that confront us at the dawn of the new millennium. We unite to be a voice of shared values in the international arenas of politics, economics and the media, and to serve as a forum for research and excellence on values in action." (194)

This commitment to social action, and the collectivist tenor of the programs and study resources recommended in the 1998/1999 draft URI charter, belie Bishop Swing's 1996 statement that "It would not be in the interest of the whole earth for a United Religions to become a political debating society with a right-wing or left-wing bias." (195)

Organizational design: a decentralized network

The proposed organization of the URI envisions cooperation with other interfaith organizations, open deliberations and decision-making, "the highest standards of integrity and ethical conduct, prudent use of resources, and fair and accurate disclosure of information," and "organizational learning and adaptation." (196) The UR would have multiple sites around the world, with "electronic satellite possibility of collecting people on an instantaneous daily basis." (197) The draft Charter says:

"The UR is decentralized. All local organizations have the right to organize in any manner, at any scale, in any area, and around any issue or activity which is relevant to and consistent with the purpose and principles. ... Authority is vested in and decisions are made at the most local level that includes all the relevant and affected parties. ... Each part of the UR has primary responsibility to develop financial and other resources to meet its needs, and secondary responsibility to share financial and other resources to help meet the needs of other parts. ... Every local UR organization shall surrender only such autonomy and resources as are essential to the regional and global pursuit of the purpose and principles."(19

Thus, the URI has chosen a decentralized, network-based management structure. Unity will be maintained through consensus rather than through centralized management control. The appearance and style of this structure is likely to increase the appeal of the URI in the US and other countries with similar liberal traditions. The draft Charter confirms a shift away from the centralized UN-style structure that Bishop Swing and other URI supporters had envisioned in 1995 and 1996. This new organizational design for the URI reduces the likelihood that others will perceive the URI as a centralized religious bureaucracy.

Agenda: "Religious Rights and Responsibilities"

The URI proposes a "Draft Agenda for Action." The first section, titled "Religious Rights and Responsibilities," states that:

"The United Religions seeks to uphold and support the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Universal Declaration of Human Responsibilities. The United Religions stands for the end of violence committed in the name of religion: 1. Violence against children. 2. Violence against women. 3. Violence against persons from a different religion." (199)

To further these goals, the URI will do research, education, and social action. It is noteworthy that the URI emphasizes violence against women - a phrase that some feminists and UN bureaucrats interpret to include laws against abortion. (Indeed, a UN commission which monitors compliance with the "Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women" recently told Colombia to "end its legal ban on abortion to bring the country into compliance with international conventions".) (200)

Agenda: "Sustainable, Just Economics" - Malthusianism and redistribution

The URI's next cause is "Sustainable, Just Economics." In their terms, this means that Malthus was right: the world is running out of resources; the rich capitalist countries of the West are to blame (no hint that the USSR, mainland China, and the other communist countries have created large-scale environmental disasters); redistribution of wealth is key to solving the world's problems; and UN efforts at economic change are frustrated by sovereign nations and that ever-ready villain, "the corporate sector":

" 'Sustainable economics' means an economic system that utilizes the world's finite resources prudently and sparingly. 'Just economics' is a system in which created wealth is distributed in a fair and equitable manner. ... There is a dire need to revisit the global economic system from a religious/spiritual perspective in order to make some fundamental changes. Efforts by the UN in this direction are often frustrated by the domination of national interests in that body. In addition, the corporate sector's dominance of world economic practice lacks a moral, socially responsible foundation. The United Religions can bring the moral voice of our sacred traditions to bear on the following issues, among others: 1) The present rate of using the world's resources is alarmingly fast. The planet Earth is under strain, and there is a need to slow down. Otherwise, the coming generations might find themselves living on a barren planet. 2) Currently, a tremendous gap exists between the rich and the poor. The twenty OECD (201) countries contain 17% of the world's population, yet own 75% of the world's wealth. 3) Major world trade exists in arenas that are morally reprehensible and exploitative: the sex trade, the arms trade, and the drug trade." (202)

To further these goals, the URI would create task forces and forums for the elite, who would presume to create an economic plan for us all:

"Proposed Projects: 1. Establish a Blue Ribbon Task Force (a select group of highly competent people) to study and understand the complexities of the present situation and develop an action plan to work toward a more sustainable, equitable world for all. 2. Create a forum to discuss and understand the global financial system. 3. Sponsor a conference where CEO's [sic] and billionaires will be invited to attend and give talks on the global economy. 4. Create a forum for addressing justice issues arising from the world trade in sex, arms, and drugs." (203)

The State of the World Forum - which is friendly to the URI - is an example of the forums and conferences that the URI suggests.

Agenda: "Ecological Imperatives" - honoring a sacred Earth

The URI moves on to address "Ecological Imperatives." They decry the current ecological crisis - including human "overpopulation." (204) The URI's solution involves teaching us all to rediscover "respect for the sacredness of the whole of Planet Earth":

"The root of this ecological crisis is a spiritual crisis. Just as the religions and spiritual traditions of the world teach respectful interaction with a sacred whole, so must spiritual values and moral imperatives help humanity to rediscover a reverence for all life and respect for the sacredness of the whole of Planet Earth. Therefore, we call for interfaith cooperation in furthering this vision for love and protection of the Earth, reverence for life, and harmony with all living beings." (205)

The draft Charter offers a long list of project ideas to implement this vision. Most of these involve re-directing education, environmental action, and religious training to foster a new, "Green" religion.

The first project listed is "Develop an 'eco-literacy' project for young people" (206) - in other words, start the indoctrination early.

The second project involves a strategy that would be familiar to any Communist: a plan to "consciously infiltrate" existing environmental groups to "inspire a more holistic world view":

"Find out what ecology groups are active and see what spiritual values might be brought to bear in those. (This might be a way in which the 'Supporting the Agenda' group and this group might collaborate - the 'Supporting' group might provide a list of local organizations, and UR reps might begin to consciously 'infiltrate' those organizations in ways that might inspire a more holistic world view.)" (207)

The URI would "create solstice and equinox festivals, the natural earth holidays, which celebrate the changes on the planet." (20

They would also have "the religions of the world ... lead the way in addressing the issue of global climate changes" by modeling the use of renewable energy sources and "creating pressure for lower-cost sources of renewable energy." (209) Thus, the URI would encourage the religions to act as a political lobby, "creating pressure" on behalf of the theory - as yet unproven - that the Earth is warming due to human activity.

The URI would also exploit millennial fear, using "the 'clout' of the Year 2000 Problem as a foot in the door for developing local [sic] sustainable and caring community - an argument for 'getting off the grid'." (210)

There would be a "URI course to 'retool' both clergy and lay religious leaders in the philosophy of spiritual ecology"; currently available examples of these courses include "Whole Earth and Whole Person Ministry" and "Integration of Native American and Christian Traditions." (211)

In addition, "Local or regional UR groups should sponsor ecumenical and interfaith celebrations on the Environmental Sabbath, which has already been established by the UN." (212)

The study resources recommended in the URI charter include the "Earth Charter," as proposed by Maurice Strong's Earth Charter Commission, several works (such as The Voice of the Earth) by Theodore Roszak, a book by Howard Clinebell titled Ecotherapy: Healing Ourselves and Healing the Earth, and Threshold 2000, written by Gerald Barney, of the Millennium Institute. (213) ...

Agenda: "Building Cultures of Nonviolence and Respect"

The fourth - and least controversial - section of the URI "Draft Agenda for Action" involves "Building Cultures of Nonviolence and Respect." The UR "will become part of an international movement that fosters authentic personal and corporate good will and reconciliation and that actively promotes peace. In particular, it will work to heal religious wounds by seeking tools from every faith for respecting the stranger, empowering nonviolence, and nurturing reconciliation." (214) Peace would be fostered when members of different religions listen to each other, since listening "is the cornerstone of building peace"; "communities of all sizes" could "declare themselves Peace Zones." (215) To ensure that all this happens, "hire a media person at the URI," since "creating a culture of peace requires education, media attention, and a coordination of resources." (216)

Agenda: "Sharing the Wisdom and Cultures of Faith Traditions"

The fifth section of the URI "Agenda for Action" calls for "Sharing the Wisdom and Cultures of Faith Traditions." Here is where the URI belief in the common origin and common goal of all religions becomes explicit. A new "theology of acceptance," a common collection of "sacred writings and oral wisdom," and shared "spiritual practices" are planned: the triad of creed, code, and cult that, in human terms, defines a religion. The URI draft charter says:

"Religion is concerned with the relationship of human beings with their spiritual Origin. We believe in the universality and eternity of the Spirit. We believe that all religions derive their wisdom from that ultimate Source. Therefore, the world's faith traditions share in common wisdom, which can be obscured by differences in religious concepts and practices. ... The United Religions promotes dialogue. A theology of acceptance will help the world's people explore common ground. Our awareness of unity within religious diversity promotes ever-increasing kinship." (217)

Proposed projects include: * "Interfaith Dialogue on Sacred Scriptures: we propose a compilation of information from sacred writings and oral wisdom. Similar expressions of faith exist all over the world. We intend to collect and edit this material as an important dialogue resource. ... * Interfaith Sharing of Spiritual Practices" (21

"Unity within religious diversity" and "ever-increasing kinship" appear to describe the gradual introduction of a New Religion; they just want to phase it in slowly, so as not to scare people off in the early stages.

Agenda: "Supporting the Overall UR Agenda" - building a headquarters

The draft charter concludes with a suggested mission for a central UR office:

"A central office which acts as a clearinghouse and which serves the regional offices would facilitate the work of the UR by:

1) providing access to information 2) supporting grassroots regional efforts 3) inviting guidance toward enlightenment in a global voice 4) awarding recognition and appreciation to effort within and outside the organization 5) ensuring the just global distribution of financial and other resources." (219)

Proposed projects for the UR central office include exploring "ways to invite enlightened guidance in the project, 'Holding the Space that Holds Us'," support for fundraising, providing literature and telecommunications networks for the UR regions, establishing links with interfaith groups, and establishing ties with researchers in universities and think tanks. (220)

The URI Charter concludes with a call for readers to offer suggestions for changes. Any of us could suggest that URI adopt a short substitute for the Charter: the Ten Commandments, the Beatitudes, and the call from Christ, "The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand; repent, and believe in the gospel." (Mk. 1:14) There's reason to doubt that the URI will accept this change, even if the new, shorter Charter would save paper and other natural resources.


Bishop William Swing, opening speech for the United Religions summit meeting, June 24-28, 1996, Bishop William Swing, "The United Religions Initiative," document issued in April 1996 by the URI
2 Comments
The United Religions Initiative (URI)....ONE WORLD CHURCH IS ON ITS WAY!!! Sep 14, 2008 11:38 pm
169 Views
The United Religions Initiative URI founded in 1995 by Episcopal Bishop William Swing, intends to create a spiritual equivalent of the United Nations, encompassing all "religions, spiritual expressions, and indigenous traditions." The URI Charter says that the organization's purpose is "to promote enduring, daily interfaith cooperation" and to "end religiously motivated violence;" they also plan to "create cultures of peace, justice and healing for the Earth and all living beings."

The URI has support among some leaders of Asian religions (including the Dalai Lama), some liberal Protestants, and Reform Jews, dissident Catholics, and leaders of the state-run churches in China. URI activities have occurred in 58 countries on all continents, and in 33 states in the U.S. The URI claims that 1 million people participated in its 3-day global "religious cease-fire" from 31 December 1999 through 2 January 2000. The Vatican, the Eastern Orthodox, and Evangelical Protestants oppose the URI.

The URI has friends and funding sources in high places-including George Soros, the billionaire currency speculator, and Richard Blum, the wealthy husband of Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.). URI allies include Mikhail Gorbachev's star-studded State of the World Forum, and the Earth Council-headed by Maurice Strong, a wealthy Canadian advocate of world government. The URI also enjoys tacit support or active cooperation from most other interfaith organizations, including the Council for a Parliament of the World's Religions, the World Conference on Religion and Peace, the Temple of Understanding, and the North American Interfaith Network.

Despite the seemingly-benign goals of the URI, Christians should firmly oppose this movement.

URI leaders and their allies repeatedly equate evangelism to manipulative "proselytizing" and violence. If the URI vision prevails, Christian evangelism based on the unique, saving identity and acts of Christ would be ruled out. As Bishop Swing says, "there will have to be a godly cease-fire, a temporary truce where the absolute exclusive claims of each [religion] will be honored but an agreed upon neutrality will be exercised in terms of proselytizing, condemning, murdering or dominating. These will not be tolerated in the United Religions zone-the whole world. URI leaders say "proselytizing" is the work of "fundamentalists," and URI board member Paul Chafee says, "We can't afford fundamentalists in a world this small."

Despite the URI's insistent denial that it intends to mix the world's religions or start a New Religion, URI worship ceremonies and the writings of URI leaders point in that direction. At the 1995 interfaith service that launched the URI, "holy water from the Ganges, the Amazon, the Red Sea, the River Jordan, and other sacred streams" was mixed in a single "bowl of unity" on the altar of Grace Cathedral. Bishop Swing made the meaning of the ritual clear: "As these sacred waters find confluence here.may the city that chartered the nations of the world bring together the religions of the world." In June 2000, the URI Charter was signed in Pittsburgh at a gathering of 275 interfaith activists from around the world. Rowan Fairgrove-an avowed Wiccan long active in the URI-reported that this chant started in the URI conclave: "Gathered in here in the mystery of the hour/Gathered here in one strong body/Gathered here in our unity and power/Spirit draw near." At this meeting, Bishop Swing said, "This is the spirit's property.and no one owns it." Fifty years from now, people from all over the world will flock to Pittsburgh in tribute of this signing." The "spirit" thus invoked was left un-named.

In The Coming United Religions, Bishop Swing has written, "The time comes, though, when common language and a common purpose for all religions and spiritual movements must be discerned and agreed upon. Merely respecting and understanding other religions is not enough." Since the purpose of religion is the service of God, Bishop Swing's call for "all religions and spiritual movements" to have a common purpose" is, in effect, a call for all to worship a common god.

The URI's desire to "manifest love and justice among all life in our Earth community" does not extend to the lives of the unborn. Although URI documents denounce many of the world's evils, they say nothing against abortion or artificial contraception. Bishop Swing has likened "the insane expansion of population" to exponential growth of algae in a lake. Two high-level URI executives-Canon Charles Gibbs, URI executive director, and the Rev. William Rankin, the URI vice president-have signed a manifesto issued in early 2000 by the Sexual Information and Education Council of the U.S. (SIECUS). This "Religious Declaration on Sexual Morality, Justice, and Healing" opposes "unsustainable population growth" and favors "blessing of same-sex unions," ordination of women, artificial contraception, abortion, and "lifelong, age appropriate sexuality education in schools, seminaries, and community settings."

The URI promotes religious relativism, the notion that all religions are equally true and are equally paths to God. In The Coming United Religions, Bishop Swing illustrates this belief. Six lines represent the major faiths-Christianity, Hinduism, Buddhism, Islam, Judaism, and the indigenous religions; like multiple paths up a mountain, these lines converge from below on a single point, a divine "unity which transcends the world." At the top of the mountain are the esoteric believers from each faith, who "intuit that they were ultimately in unity with people of other religions because all come together at the apex, in the Divine. Everyone below the line would be identified as exoteric. These people in all religions would wed the form of faith to the content or final truth of their own faith. Thus, the forms of one's faith become absolutized because these forms, alone, are held to carry the truth." Christ, the Incarnate Word and the only Savior, is thus demoted to one of the many "forms of one's faith."

Bishop William Swing, "The United Religions Initiative," document issued in April 1996 by the URI
4 Comments
Ecumenical Christian Apostacy....End time False Church Sep 14, 2008 3:18 pm
190 Views
What exactly is the Ecumenical movement you ask? It is a belief that all churches(regardless of denomination or doctrine) should be in unity with one another and even with other faiths. So what is wrong with that you ask?

Jesus said that he alone is the way the truth and the life and that those who are not with me are against me. The bible also says that compromise and loving the world, worldly people or the enemies of God IS SIN!!! The bible calls Christians to be separate and COME OUT FROM AMONG THEM! BE SEPARATE FROM ALL FALSE DOCTRINE THAT GLORIFIES MAN AND DETHRONES JESUS CHRIST AS KING OF KINGS AND LORD OF LORDS.

In these last days we see those calling themselves Christians
who are only enemy pawns to lead others ASTRAY INTO DARKNESS. OH, YES THEY MAY SEEM NICE, AND EXCEEDINGLY SO but BEWARE OF THE LEAVEN of this Apostasy for it will send you straight to the path of hell!

What are the signs of a ecumenical apostate?????

COMPROMISE FOR THE SAKE OF PEACE

LOVE EVERY BODY AT THE COST OF TRUTH

BE IN UNITY REGARDLESS OF ESSENTIAL DOCTRINAL DIFFERENCES

REJECTION OF THE LITERAL INTERPRETATION OF SCRIPTURE

REJECTION OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF THE FAITH (WHICH TO THEM IS A DIRTY WORD)

CHRISTIAN WAKE UP, THE ONE WORLD CHURCH IS BEING BUILT ON THIS APOSTASY DOCTRINE...A FALSE UNITY, A FALSE PEACE.

SOON ANTI CHRIST WILL APPEAR AS A MAN BRING FALSE PEACE. HE WILL ALLY HIMSELF WITH THIS APOSTATE CHURCH IN ORDER TO GET TO POWER AND THEN HE WILL TURN ON IT AND DESTROY IT, THE BIBLE SAYS.

DESTRUCTION AND RUIN WILL COME TO THE HARLOT OF BABYLON(FALSE ECUMENICAL CHURCH) AND ALL WHO ARE PART OF HER WILL BE DESTROYED WITH HER!

COME OUT, COME OUT, COME OUT, SAYS THE LORD!!! SOLA SCRIPTURA.
4 Comments
1 2 3 4 5 ... 10 ... 19 20 21 22 23 ... 30 ... 40 ... 50 ... 60 ... 70 ... 80 ... 90 ... 100 ... 110 ... 124 125 126

To link to this blog (Sweethoney2007) use [blog Sweethoney2007] in your messages.
48 F
Guidelines
January 2009
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1
  		2
1
3
 
4
  		5
  		6
  		7
  		8
  		9
  		10
 
11
  		12
  		13
  		14
  		15
  		16
  		17
 
18
  		19
  		20
  		21
  		22
  		23
  		24
 
25
  		26
  		27
  		28
  		29
  		30
  		31
 

Recent Visitors
VisitorAgeSexDate
BelovedByHim 47F1/7
countryboy1962 46M1/7
musicman62 50M1/7
svofgh 64M1/5
seekingtruth3 53M1/5
Claudia_T 51F1/5
Noah235 51M1/4
44522333M1/3
godschoice200856M1/3
melvine47439M1/3
Most Recent Comments by Others
PostPosterPost Date
LAW KEEPING WILL SEND YOU TO HELL....BUT OHHHHHH THE BLOOD OF JESUS IT WASHES WHITE AS SNOW!!!!Sweethoney2007Jan 8 9:49 am
JESUS CAME TO DESTROY THE WORKS OF THE DEVIL( MANIFEST IN THE CARNAL UNSAVED PERSON).Claudia_TJan 4 10:40 pm
THE FLATTERING TOUNGEchocnrosesJan 2 7:58 pm
SALVATION IS GODS DECISION AND NOT MANS.Sweethoney2007Jan 2 11:32 am
IT TAKES 1000 POINTS TO ENTER INTO HEAVEN........OR GRACE.......godschoice2008Jan 1 9:57 pm
ONLY BY UNDERSTANDING GRACE DOES ONE TRULY KNOW JESUS!!!Sweethoney2007Dec 31 9:10 am
A WORD FROM THE LORD TO DENNISSweethoney2007Dec 30 7:38 am
TWELVE QUESTIONS FOR CHRISTMAS! CHRISTMAS TRIVIASweethoney2007Dec 22 8:30 am
GOD IS PRO LIFEwpx1Dec 21 2:23 am
The Tablecloth Christmas StorySweethoney2007Dec 19 8:19 pm
STUPID IS AS STUPID DOES....HOW STUPID ARE YOU? THE STUPID TEST.Sweethoney2007Dec 17 6:01 pm